Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: diamond6
You have stated it clearly and succinctly. Some freepers think we need to make this more complicated than it really is.

No the ones who have attempted to complicate the issue are the ones that get a license to practice law and then proceed to dissemble the Constitution.

Where in the Constitutional requirements to hold the office does it say revised and extended or site some court precedence. My Constitution has not had the wording changed to reference that some act of Congress or some court changed the meaning of 'natural born'.

211 posted on 02/02/2016 6:33:18 PM PST by Just mythoughts (Jesus said Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]


To: Just mythoughts

“My Constitution has not had the wording changed to reference that some act of Congress or some court changed the meaning of ‘natural born’.”

The framers didn’t “change” the meaning of “natural born”, because they never defined it.

That’s why Congress has the power to determine who was “natural born” and who wasn’t.

The Congress acted to define “natural born”, and it is established by statute.

End of story...


222 posted on 02/02/2016 6:37:59 PM PST by diamond6 (Behold this Heart which has so loved men!" Jesus to St. Margaret Mary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson