Rush was on fire.
This article just touches on it.
Rush can say a lot in 1:40.
“Rush can say a lot in 1:40.”
Yeh, like calling Rubio a Reagan Republican.
People are going bonkers this election season.
Rush, however, is at least partially wrong in this instance. Cruz had a huge ground game and spent a ton of money. That was the larger factor. I actually understated this on another thread, when I estimated Cruz had used 1 volunteer for every 4.3 votes for himself: - Cruz said he had 12,000 volunteers working in Iowa, AND 200,000 nationwide (some working the phones from Texas). Additionally, I don’t know how many people he’s paying (not even including the data / voter psychoanalysis people he hired for, IIRC, 3 million dollars.)
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/feb/01/ted-cruz-trump-iowa-caucus-voter-targeting
The question is whether this can be sustained.
I also would guess Cruz could be attacked on the extreme level of voter profiling / psychoanalysis employed. At what point does pressure / manipulation go too far?