Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I hereby urge Donald Trump and all Iowa Trump supporters to bring to your caucus a copy (or better yet, and original) of the following nefarious mailer Cruz mailed out in Iowa and explain during caucus the vile nature of this mailer, including the fact that the "grades" are fradulent because SecState Iowa does not record caucus attendance, as well as the overtly threatening nature of this mailer that concludes with the threat that "A follow-up notice may be issued following Monday's caucuses".


1 posted on 02/01/2016 9:00:44 AM PST by catnipman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: catnipman

That was a horrible, horrible move by Cruz.


2 posted on 02/01/2016 9:04:38 AM PST by Principled (...the Supreme Court of the United States favors some laws over others...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: catnipman

I think this can officially can be classified as SPAM, after the 50th reference. Trumpbots must post these things in shifts.


3 posted on 02/01/2016 9:04:43 AM PST by catfish1957 (I display the Confederate Battle Flag with pride in honor of my brave ancestors who fought w/ valor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: catnipman

As much as I like Ted, this was really, REALLY stupid of him.

Had I received something like this in the mail, I would be really, REALLY pissed off.


5 posted on 02/01/2016 9:05:48 AM PST by Quality_Not_Quantity (Democrat Drinking Game - Every time they mention a new social program, chug someone else's beer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: catnipman

Ted is mean and nasty, especially when under pressure.


10 posted on 02/01/2016 9:13:05 AM PST by patq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: catnipman

Sue for defamation of character.


11 posted on 02/01/2016 9:14:41 AM PST by I want the USA back (The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it. Orwell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: catnipman

Y’all are missing a key point: data mining.

Expect the Left is gathering such information, and correlating it with lots of other databases, to identify EXACTLY who to target for “get out the vote” campaigns. Steffany Hinkeldey only votes half the time? well, we can sure look up that unusual name to discern probable R/D preference, then start sending targeted advertising to persuade her to vote this time around - or, perhaps, send discouraging mailers designed to persuade her to stay home. Couple that with border precincts, existing on the edge between Left-leaning political urban archipelagos and the sea of deep-red rural voters, and you can spend money very effectively to steer election results.

There’s a huge difference in success between a campaign that pays millions to convince whole states when most precincts won’t be persuaded, vs targeting individual voters in swing districts that can push a state’s winner-takes-all-delegates favorably.


12 posted on 02/01/2016 9:15:16 AM PST by ctdonath2 (History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the week or the timid. - Ike)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: catnipman

So much of this kind of tactic depends on whose payroll you are REALLY on. Regardless, I am surprised at Cruz for this kind of trash.

Go Trump.


13 posted on 02/01/2016 9:16:26 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: catnipman

I am a Cruz supporter...but I can say without any excuse or preamble that this was a big mistake by Cruz.

People will see and feel “big brother,” all over it...they very thing Cruz is campaigning against.

In addition, it will offend, and then anger them, and they will most likely (if they vote at all), go out and vote against whomever sent such a correspondence.

Cruz has some knuckleheads working for him...or agents working against him.

Does not matter...he himself should have seen how crazy this was and either stopped it...or if he did not find out until later...he should have apologized and fired the people who were responsible.

This will hurt him, particularly in Iowa, but also wherever people hear of it...and you can bet the competition will trumpet it far and wide.


14 posted on 02/01/2016 9:17:45 AM PST by Jeff Head (Semper Fidelis - Molon Labe - Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: catnipman
Funny how your spamming the site with the same picture OVER AND OVER reminds me of tactics used by Obama devotees.

Does your "indignation" extend to Rubio, who did the same thing?

15 posted on 02/01/2016 9:19:29 AM PST by TXSearcher (Longtime Lurker......now a newbie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: catnipman; xzins
SecState Iowa does not record caucus attendance,

Oops!

16 posted on 02/01/2016 9:20:02 AM PST by P-Marlowe (Tagline pending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: catnipman

The only those that are in the establishment can win is to cheat. That is why I go for Trump.

Trump for President.


17 posted on 02/01/2016 9:22:35 AM PST by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: catnipman

Dear Mr Pate: shut up and count the votes.

Your ‘outrage’ is little more than coattail-riding with a view to higher office for yourself.


19 posted on 02/01/2016 9:24:30 AM PST by relictele (Principiis obsta & Finem respice - Resist The Beginnings & Consider The Ends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: catnipman

Paul Pate doth protest too much.

The mailing was colossally stupid, but the envelope was clearly marked that it was “Paid for by Cruz for President,” and only mentioned the Secretary of State in a disclaimer that it was based on public information.


21 posted on 02/01/2016 9:27:24 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: catnipman

When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer ‘Present’ or ‘Not Guilty’.

Theodore Roosevelt


27 posted on 02/01/2016 9:43:28 AM PST by HarleyLady27 ("The Force Awakens"!!! TRUMP;TRUMP;TRUMP;TRUMP!!! 100%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: catnipman

I think , ‘how would my elderly mother have responded to this’, the answer is, she would have had a meltdown. Creepy, lowlife politics.


32 posted on 02/01/2016 9:52:23 AM PST by heights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

The SOS claiming violations. What violations? I heard this shaming tactic is frequently used. Also, “Paid for by Cruz for President” should be enough to indicate it’s campaign material. The notice at the bottom indicates the data is public.

While the tactic was foolish, the SOS is doubling down on the stupidity.


37 posted on 02/01/2016 11:13:01 AM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: catnipman; DungeonMaster
This is SO disappointing. I hope I get a chance to ask Sen. Cruz about this when I attend his rally today. (I don't expect he'll mention it himself.)

Knowing as I do the Iowa Secy. of State and former Cedar Rapids mayor Paul Pate, I'm confident he WELCOMED the opportunity to "rip Cruz." He has always struck me as the personification of the term "Republican establishment."

38 posted on 02/01/2016 11:23:24 AM PST by newgeezer (It is [the people's] right and duty to be at all times armed. --Thomas Jefferson, 1824)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: catnipman
Sending an apology to you for my earlier comment. I just found your posting from yesterday where you mentioned Rubio's "shame" report card.
39 posted on 02/01/2016 11:29:38 AM PST by TXSearcher (Longtime Lurker......now a newbie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: catnipman; admin

Why is this front page again? I understand the need to saturate FR with Hatred of conservative candidates, but this is getting ridiculous.


49 posted on 02/01/2016 12:22:24 PM PST by DrewsMum (If they wanted a conservative, they'd vote for one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: catnipman

Why not just tell people to caucus based on their guys positive qualities instead of attacking others?


53 posted on 02/01/2016 12:32:25 PM PST by DrewsMum (If they wanted a conservative, they'd vote for one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson