Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nathanbedford

The claim that Ted Cruz lacks discernment for supporting the appointment of Chief Justice Roberts is among the most outrageous departures from sanity that we seem to experience on a daily basis from supporters of Donald Trump. Anyone with any knowledge of how the bar operates, how the Supreme Court operates, how judicial clerks operate, how advocates operate, especially advocates before the Supreme Court, would never go near such a statement as, “Cruz lacks discernment” in the context of Cruz’ support of the appointment.

There is nothing in Robert’s career prior to his appointment to the Supreme Court, including his service on the DC court of appeals, which suggests to any knowledgeable observer that Roberts would rule as he did on Obama care. To suggest otherwise is not to indict Ted Cruz but to betray a level of ignorance, or more likely, rank partisan politicking so common among Trump supporters who eagerly ape their hero.

There is one other facet of this episode which deserves remark; it brings credit on Ted Cruz and, once again, highlights the failings of Donald Trump. Ted Cruz admitted he made a mistake, when is the last time Donald Trump ever admitted having made a mistake about anything? To illustrate by way of one among many possible examples from Trump’s biography, Donald Trump was warned up and down against his hedonistic investments in Atlantic City which subsequently went bankrupt, but Trump heedlessly persisted.

In contrast, Ted Cruz had absolutely no evidence from which to conclude that the appointment of John Roberts might be a mistake. Nevertheless, Cruz is a big enough man to admit a mistake even when the mistake is not his fault but Donald Trump is so narcissistic that he denies mistakes which are clearly his fault.
________________________________________________________

What I was thinking, but you said it better than I wold have.

I would like a trumpist to identify any specific decisions that Roberts made that would have indicated he would be a bad Justice.

Meanwhile they ignore Trump’s contentson that his pro partial birth abortion sister would make a “Great” Justice.


76 posted on 02/01/2016 5:14:21 AM PST by Leto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Leto; nathanbedford

Analyzing GOPe/Uniparty collusion regarding how John Roberts got to the bench is an important step in beating the GOPe in 2016.

The only “outrageous departure from sanity” I see here is an unwillingness to realize conservatives have been duped for decades by the same GOPe thugs — and it’s only reasonable to try to figure out Cruz’s part in the Bush decision making.

Wake up. It’s time to vet Cruz, Rubio and Jeb the same way Palin was vetted.


92 posted on 02/01/2016 5:49:20 AM PST by Sontagged (Woe to you when all men shall speak well of you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson