Posted on 01/30/2016 10:57:43 AM PST by BlackFemaleArmyColonel
Donald Trump isn't planning on ditching the next debate. In an interview with NH1 News, the real estate mogul was asked whether he planned to participate in the next Republican debate on Feb. 6, co-hosted by ABC News and IJReview and held at St. Anselm College in Manchester, New Hampshire.
"I think I will be, yeah," Trump said when asked if he will attend. "I look forward to it."
"I'm doing really well here," he added, taking the opportunity to plug his popularity in state polls. "I will be in New Hampshire doing the debates."
He also took a shot at his chief rival, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, whom he said got "very badly hurt" during Thursday night's debate.
Trump is up by nearly 20 percentage points in the RealClearPolitics average of New Hampshire polls.
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
GO TRUMP
But will he even be innvited?
MSNBC hosting the next one?
How many debates do they really need? This circular firing squad is nuts.
That’s what he says now. Give it a couple of weeks for the story to evolve.
Why wouldn’t he be? Rand Paul was invited to this past one after skipping the Fox Business debate
Ha, ha. Keep them guessing. Take that FNC.
I say: "Who cares?"
How is that any different than the rest of them?
“How many debates do they really need?”
74
Point has been made with staying away from the Fox News debate. There was always a standing invitation even there, but he chose not to honor that invitation by participating in a rival event that evening.
There are no similar events being planned competing with the February 6th New Hampshire scheduled debate.
There’s ANOTHER debate???!?
Sheesh, I don’t recall ever seeing so many.
“How many debates do they really need? This circular firing squad is nuts.”
And the problem is they aren’t debates at all. They are agenda driven charades where journalists try to tip the balance by making some candidates look bad and others good.
Journalist now are salivating at the through of taking Trump and Cruz down.
The RNC. . . well, I guess you can’t fix stupid. But they should structure the “debates” as formal debates without any journalists and without questions. The topics should be circulated beforehand and the candidates can state their positions and respond to the positions of other candidates.
Discussing and actually debating issues with each other? not so much.
Apparently they need three-hundred seventy-four trillion, four-hundred ninety-seven billion, seven-hundred and twelve million, five-hundred and sixty-two thousand, one-hundred and forty-one debates.
And not one less, dam you.
ugh...sadly correct
Seventy-eight debates per second is what they need to aim for.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.