Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Branstad: Cruz prospects dimming in Iowa
Politico ^ | January 29, 2016; 12:42 pm | Alex Isenstadt

Posted on 01/29/2016 12:51:37 PM PST by Red Steel

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

1 posted on 01/29/2016 12:51:37 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

My parents lived in Iowa before they retired to Florida. My Dad was one of those who had nicknames for people he didn’t think much of. His name for Brandstad was “Terry Braindead”.


2 posted on 01/29/2016 12:54:18 PM PST by Parmenio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Branstad protecting the ethanol racket - just like the Trumpster....


3 posted on 01/29/2016 12:55:00 PM PST by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
"Ted Cruz was ahead in Iowa, but as people have figured out his stance on issues that are important to the economy of the state" he's lost support, Branstad said during a Friday morning taping of CSPAN's "Newsmakers," pointing specifically to Cruz's opposition to ethanol subsidies - an issue of central importance to Iowans. "He was ahead on polls, but now he's dropped below Trump."

In other words, Cruz has fallen because he refused to pander to the Iowa ethanol lobby.

But it's Trump who can't be bought. Riiiiiiight.

4 posted on 01/29/2016 12:55:07 PM PST by dem bums
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

POLITICO - and that’s all you need to know.


5 posted on 01/29/2016 12:55:33 PM PST by longfellow (Bill Maher, the 21st hijacker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

This governor is a piece of work, just what you’d expect from the GOP establishment. In his mind, it’s great public policy to ruin the engines and the fuel economy of everyday Americans by making us put food into our gas tanks because if we are made to do that, then his farm constituents will be more likely to keep voting for him.


6 posted on 01/29/2016 12:55:39 PM PST by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Lots of Snark against Cruz.

Should Trump win, lets see how his supreme court picks are.

How his deals go with Pelosi and Shumer. Spending and entitlement spending. And defunding planned parenthood.

This is it Cruzers, we gather up now or are stuck to vote Trump in general and only to be disappointed in 2017.


Trump Time Capsule 2017


7 posted on 01/29/2016 12:56:55 PM PST by fooman (Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Cruz ain’t no Issac Newton, otherwise, he’d understand that gravity applies not just to Trump and Carson, but to himself as well.


8 posted on 01/29/2016 12:57:40 PM PST by Vision Thing (Vote Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Ethanol is the only factor in Braindead’s thinking. He has said so repeatedly.


9 posted on 01/29/2016 12:58:15 PM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Big Ethanol speaks.


10 posted on 01/29/2016 12:59:03 PM PST by Charles Henrickson (Social and constitutional conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fooman

Take heart that Cruz is just a youngster.

Four more election cycles before he even hits the threshold of prime politician age (mid 60s).


11 posted on 01/29/2016 12:59:05 PM PST by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

To our fellow FR Cruz supporters;

Hang in there a little longer.
The pain will be over very soon
this coming Tuesday morning.


12 posted on 01/29/2016 1:01:28 PM PST by tennmountainman ("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small pittancez)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

I HOPE this RINO is dead wrong, just like most of them!


13 posted on 01/29/2016 1:03:13 PM PST by JSDude1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

So the POTUS should be elected based on their stance on ethanol. Got it.


14 posted on 01/29/2016 1:03:26 PM PST by Rusty0604 (1q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

Hillary is harmful to women. Grave dereliction. Corruption. Crimes. Bad for the economy and bad for national security. Treason. John Haung. Charlie Trie. Whitewater. Cattle futures. Sally Perdue / Miller. Willey.

On and on. Remember y’all?

Vince Foster. Chelsea Hubble.

Hopefully, Cruz runs against Bernie. Or at least Trump against Bernie and the FBI leaks like a sieve.

Otherwise the brave Clinton women now talking may be harmed.


15 posted on 01/29/2016 1:04:38 PM PST by fooman (Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Parmenio

He may be Braindead but he is a four time governor. His organization definitely has clout.


16 posted on 01/29/2016 1:05:40 PM PST by georgiarat (Obama, providing incompetence since Day One!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson

King Cornhole Rules.


17 posted on 01/29/2016 1:07:09 PM PST by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

Did not work out that way for the Huckster of for Santorum.


18 posted on 01/29/2016 1:07:10 PM PST by fooman (Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

19 posted on 01/29/2016 1:07:19 PM PST by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

I did actually watch the entire debate. Even though it wasn’t as entertaining without Trump, it was informative. I thought Cruz’s response to the question about ethanol and the gratuitous cut to Branstad sitting in the audience was right on the money.

Cruz pointed out that it is not the government’s role to pick winners and losers. He stated that he has nothing against ethanol, per se, but that he wants to remove ALL government subsidies and to let the free market pick winners and losers, not the government via regulation or executive fiat.

In both constitutional and raw economic terms, he’s right.


20 posted on 01/29/2016 1:10:29 PM PST by ManHunter (You can run, but you'll only die tired... Army snipers: Reach out and touch someone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson