Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dragnet2

They do the same with DUI stops, which are also unconstitutional.

...

Which Supreme Court decision was that?


125 posted on 01/29/2016 12:25:29 AM PST by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]


To: Moonman62

I don’t care what the politicized Supreme Court says regarding this. I believe stopping people in random checkpoints are wrong and unconstitutional.

Get it?


128 posted on 01/29/2016 12:34:22 AM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62; dragnet2; EternalVigilance
Moonman62:

The SCOTUS (not that they are the be all and end all, see Roe vs. Wade, "gay""marriage", Kelo, the Dred Scott decision which triggered the Civil War and nearly 700 thousand deaths of Americans, Plessy vs. Ferguson and a rich and sad anthology of other SCOTUS blunders starting in the time of John Marshall as CJ)), even the SCOTUS, has ruled repeatedly that the police MUST have an articulable reason for ANY motor vehicle stop and that would not include that they have heard vague rumors that SOME drivers drink and drive, there are bars nearby and it is closing time and, "hey, that guy is driving a car! Let's stop him." Or, if he doesn't immediately knuckle under to government Almighty, let's shoot him.

I see and hear Banjoboy from Deliverance in the background.

308 posted on 01/29/2016 1:45:49 PM PST by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline: Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society/Rack 'em Danno!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson