Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee
For those of you who don't speak "Statistics", let me concentrate only one phrase in this article: "a ratio of only 2:1 for cases to variables".

What his means is that instead of using 50 data points to define the trend of the data, the original "researchers" used exactly 2 for each variable. Take a piece of paper and draw X and Y axes on it. Draw two data points anywhere you want. Now draw a circle around each data point, the circles represent the degree of inaccuracy inherent in taking the measurement, and all science includes inaccuracies. Now for the interesting part - Add two more lines. Draw the first line tangent to the upper portion of the first circle and the lower portion of the second circle. Draw the second line tangent to the lower portion of the first circle and the upper portion of the second circle. The two lines you just drew represent just how widely the results can vary with only two data points. As I've often said, "Give me any two data points and I can prove anything I want to prove."

5 posted on 01/28/2016 7:11:45 AM PST by Pecos (What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Pecos
Great post!
6 posted on 01/28/2016 7:13:11 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Pecos

>> “Give me any two data points and I can prove anything I want to prove.”

Ahh — So that’s how the chocolate ration got “bigger” when it went from 40gm per week to 28!


10 posted on 01/28/2016 2:46:18 PM PST by HLPhat (Preventing Global Cooling one tank full at a time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson