Posted on 01/27/2016 9:10:55 PM PST by Helicondelta
The Trump Campaign announced Tuesday Donald Trump will skip the FOX News GOP debate--. trump debate skip
Donald Trump told CNN that when FOX News put out its snarky press release today, he said, "Bye,bye!"
Instead Donald Trump will hold a fundraiser for wounded veterans on CNN at the same time.
It was a smart decision. Look at what Donald Trump is going to miss-
FOX News invited a radical Muslim activist, a Bernie Sanders supporter, a Black Lives Matter supporter and a Mexican illegal immigrant to the debate to confront Donald Trump.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
If fox gets nastier and nastier and doesn’t quit, Trump might deny them access when he’s elected.
” I now must ask Trumpsters why do you support a RINO?”
I now must ask, why do you?
Trump hasn't been part of the eGOP "scene" in DC and those that have spent their entire lives climbing the social ladder in the eGOP are scared they won't retain their positions if Trump wins. Period. THAT is why they oppose Trump.
"Don't look now, but while our best conservative is running a political campaign, Trump is leading a rebellion. Not as a liberal or a conservative politician, but as a successful red-blooded, can-do American capitalist.", Jim Robinson
I’ll put my Guy’s 30 + yr history of speaking, fighting, and voting for conservative causes and one of very few conservative voices in the Senate against your guy’s Support of PP, support of liberal democrats, support of the ethanol lobby support of universal healthcare, and support of pro amnesty (yes he did in 2012 blast Romney on his self depart plan as “mean spirited and crazy.”
Care to match those records?
“IMHO, Low hanging fruit. If Trump runs away from that, then he really lacks courage.”
My comment was not a condemnation nor a boast about Trump.
I am simply sickened by the GOPe/RINOs and their slimeball tactics.
Whether or not the ‘ambush’ was aimed at Trump is immaterial. It was aimed at all of the ‘outsiders’. No doubt, Yeb was given the ‘correct’ answers to the ‘ambush’ questions or, at the very least, would not be asked the ‘ambush’ questions. The other, ‘outsider’ debaters will have to subject themselves to the “plants” on the panel of “interrogators”.
I quit the Repubs and the GOPe/RINOs several years ago but did acknowledge their existence. Now.....they are simply dead to me and are non-existent.
Wouldn’t that just be so so cool? You know like a full out reality show to show then who is the real boss in all of this? I mean that’d just be the coolest thing to watch since American Idol season 2.
This is a presidential election and supposed to be about principles and the ideas that get us out of where this country is not about some narcissists elevation of someone that can barely formulate a cohesive thought beyond campaign slogans. And before you direct me to “his” position papers I doubt he wrote a single one of them. He can’t clearly articulate in the same simple language he like to use about the details in them. So ya I completely call into question whether he wrote them at all.
I’d even toss in there his supposed book he likes to point everyone to. I find it funny he loves mentioning it but can never recite a passage from it and tie it to how it applies to America today and how to fix it.
You don’t find this odd at all?
“Care to match those records?”{
I’ll put Trump winning over your guy losing!
You don’t control squat when you lose! Losers need not apply!
“I’ll put my Guy’s 30 + yr history of speaking, fighting, and voting for conservative causes “
Don’t lie. There isn’t anyone in the Senate with a 30 year history of supporting conservative causes.
You showed your true colors it has nothing to do with putting in a conservative with you, it’s all about my guy winning no matter who he is or what he has represented in his life. Same held true in 08 with Obama and his supporters. You are in good company then he won too
I wasn’t saying it would be cool, just that it might happen.
As far as elections being about the issues that matter, yes, I agree. 2008 lowered the bar to limbo height. I wish this Cruz-Trump war would go away. Both candidates are getting silly at times and their supporters are tearing each other apart.
Probably, all of them would let us down in some way. Trump is the only one of them I can stand because he brought the important issues to the forefront. He says a lot of things Duncan Hunter said in 2008 but the difference between the two is Trump is too well known to be marginalized the way Hunter was.
I will vote for Trump in the primary and feel good about it.
I will vote for whoever the nominee is in the general. Hopefully it will be Trump or Cruz(even though I’m not very fond of Cruz or any of the rest)
Your second paragraph is SPOT ON!!! Kudos to you Freeper! It cannot be repeated enough! It is becoming a charade
I’d like to clarify my 2008 reference. What I meant to say was from 2008 on, the bar has become incredibly low, starting with the debate shenanigans. The timing of how everyone dropped out was suspicious to me. I always felt like they made a deal to GIVE the thing to the Designer Negro(lame cherry’s name for the Won).
After over eight years of beltway scum and MSM covering the Won’s butt, and every outrageous thing that has transpired since he’s been in office and the GOP Gave Obama Power.... there IS NO DAMNED BAR anymore.
Here is information about state taxes. Conclusion is that their taxes are fundamentally unfair. There is an interactive map to check on distribution of tax rates for various income levels. Check your own state. You may not have much influence over federal taxes, but seek out unfairnesses in your own state to change.
http://www.itep.org/whopays/full_report.php
CONCLUSION
The main finding of this report is that virtually every state’s tax system is fundamentally unfair. The overreliance on consumption taxes and the absence of a progressive personal income tax in many states neutralize whatever benefits the working poor receive from low-income tax credits. The bleak reality is that even among the 25 states and the District of Columbia that have taken steps to reduce the working poor’s tax share by enacting state EITCs, most still require their poorest taxpayers to pay a higher effective tax rate than any other income group. The results of this study are an important reference for lawmakers seeking to understand the inequitable tax strucÂtures enacted by their predecessors. States may ignore these lessons and continue to demand that their poorest citizens pay the highest effective tax rates. Or, they may decide instead to ask wealthier families to pay tax rates more commensurate with their incomes. In either case, the path that states choose in the near future will have a major imÂpact on the well-being of their citizens — and on the fairness of state and local taxes.
Here is a simple chart of high and low income federal tax rates over time. As you can see the high income rates are relatively low compared with earlier rates.
Here is an interpretation of what Sanders probably means by socialism. He has made repeated mention of the kind seen in Denmark and other Scandinavian countries.
Here is an article on the kind of Marxist/Leninist pro Soviet/Russia socialism that you, and I, are afraid would be very dangerous to our country.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_for_Socialism_and_Liberation
Probably Greta. LOL She has a long-standing association with Trump that predates any other Fox News grunt.
Yes, Trump was much better served by holding a fund raiser for the vets.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
