Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WhiskeyX

Since when is a politician allowed to ask an interviewer not to ask him questions? If Obama did this, you’d be railing him as an imperial president.


84 posted on 01/27/2016 11:20:18 PM PST by JediJones ("Beautiful, famous, successful, married - I've had them all, secretly." -Trump on women in 2007 book)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]


To: JediJones

“Since when is a politician allowed to ask an interviewer not to ask him questions? If Obama did this, you’d be railing him as an imperial president.”

Not in these circumstances. FNC entered into contractual agreements in order to secure the rights to televise the Republican debates. Included in the contracts were terms that described who could be the moderators and provided the moderators would be required to confine their questions and comments to the ordinary and non-biased subjects of such debates. The contracts forbid using the debates as an opportunity for the moderators to editorialize or adopt openly partisan and hostile questions that are biased in favor of one or another political point of view. FNC went far beyond the standard of non-biased and partisan moderation when Megyn Kelly and the others neglected topics unfavorable to the Obama Administration and embarked upon openly hostile strawman arguments instead of debate. This is th same reason why the RNC was justified in canceling any further CNBC debates, because of the way in which CNBC breached its contract with the RNC. Trump has warned for months that FNC must not breach its contract again in the way it did in August 2015, Megyn Kelly again being responsible only in part. There were signs that FNC intended to ambush Trump with another breach of its contract, so Trump followed through with his longstanding warnings to comply with the contract or he would withdraw if and when the contract was being breached by FNC. FNC breached the contract, and Trump withdrew from the now corrupted debate.

That brings us up to date with this Bill O’Reilly interview. This interview was scheduled before FNC made it clear they were in the act of breaching the contract agreement for the debate. When the agreement was made, this breach of contract by FNC had not yet occurred, and Trump was still planning to participate in the debate. Accordingly, the topic of Trump attending the debate was not included in the agreement to appear on the Bill O’Reilly show. After the breach of contract by FNC, Trump was not obligated to appear on the Bill O’Reilly show at all, much less obligated to talk about the dispute over the breach of contract by FNC. Accordingly, Trump had every right to expect and respect such a contractual and legal matter to be excluded as a topic in an interview regarding political topics. Bill O’Reilly acknowledged this even as he attempted to persuade Trump to overlook the FNC breach of contract and thereby benefit Rupert Murdoch, the ultimate owner of FNC. Trump said he was there to answer the normal political debate questions, but not the commercial contract with FNC.


86 posted on 01/27/2016 11:53:44 PM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson