Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alter Kaker
There was a documentary on YouTube that looked into the question about who was the real King/Queen of England.

If some prince in the past had actually been the bastard son of the queen's paramour, then the current line is invalid.

The correct line of succession leads to a middleclass family man living in ... you guessed it ... Australia.

6 posted on 01/25/2016 9:55:32 PM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: who_would_fardels_bear
The correct line of succession leads to a middleclass family man living in ... you guessed it ... Australia.

A middle class family man who was the 14th Earl of Loudoun (he died in 2012, and his son is now the 15th Earl).

The argument is that if Edward IV was illegitimate (which is quite possible - there are questions as to whether his 'father' Richard, Duke of York, was anywhere near his mother at the time of conception). If that was true, George, 1st Duke of Clarence should have become King instead of Edward IV, and the Earls of Loudoun are the senior surviving heirs of the George of Clarence.

16 posted on 01/26/2016 2:43:08 PM PST by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson