> First point: Ted Cruz would have been a citizen of the Untied States absent the act due to natural inheritance of nationality from his mother...
And the inheritance of the father?
Negative. You’re spouting BS.
Citizenship is due to statute. The status conferred is “citizen”
> First point: Ted Cruz would have been a citizen of the Untied States absent the act due to natural inheritance of nationality from his mother...
What about the natural inheritance of the father? Doesn’t that count? What about the specific terms of the 1952 statute? Or doesn’t that matter? What does matter? Isn’t the 1790 act through the father? What makes the natural inheritance of the mother superior to the natural inheritance of the father? Or are you just spouting nonsense? Spouting nonsense? Spouting BS? Fountains of it.
Even if a gender neutral view is taken of all naturalization acts is does not negate the singular citizenship of the parents in 1790, 1795, et seq.
In fact you’re spewing ahistorical nonsense and nothing but.