I know what I wrote.
I am an originalist.
The founders used the term natural born citizen to prevent any foreign influence on the Presidency.
No foreign births.
No foreign parents.
Born here of citizen parents.
Can be nothing else but a US citizen.
Obama was a British subject.
Cruz was Canadian and Cuban as well as a US citizen.
Not natural born.
The new definition of simply being born a citizen makes every anchor baby and Winston Churchill eligible.
That is not what they meant.
Oh, wonderful confusion!
I know what I wrote.
I am an originalist.
The founders used the term natural born citizen to prevent any foreign influence on the Presidency.
No foreign births.
No foreign parents.
Born here of citizen parents.
Can be nothing else but a US citizen.
Obama was a British subject.
Cruz was Canadian and Cuban as well as a US citizen.
Not natural born.
The new definition of simply being born a citizen makes every anchor baby and Winston Churchill eligible.
That is not what they meant.
_________________________________________________________
I agree with each and every point..
Why would you vote for an unqualified candidate? Is the ascension of Mr Cruz to the Presidency so vital to the future of the Republic that informed, savvy voters will vote for him, even though he may be unqualified?
That level of hippocracy is what gave us the nightmare of obama..”He’s black, he’s cool,..I don’t care whether he is qualified or not...that hippocracy.
Cruz is not the purported savior of this country, he’s just another dishonest politician, jinking and jiving, not worthy of an honest vote.