Would you think this definition to be a peculiar Canadian one that they have adopted by statute - or are they referring to Vattel?
And if this Canadian definition is worth quoting, would not it also be worth adopting?
i.e. “Persons considered to be natural-born United States citizens can be born either in the United States (with exceptions for foreign diplomatic personnel), or outside the United States if, at the time of birth, one parent is a United States citizen.”
?????
Canada has its roots in British law, it was illogical of you to assume they had no such concept as natural born.
---
And if this Canadian definition is worth quoting, would not it also be worth adopting?
Oh, please. Your conversational tactics are exceedingly foul. You have the arrogance to call someone a dumbass over something you obviously have NO CLUE over, don't have enough humility to even admit you were wrong, then want to imply the my posting of the quote in order to disprove your ignorance has something to do with a desire to adopt Canadian law.
The Founders fought a war to rid themselves of British rule, and anyone who wants to give the federal government the prerogatives of a King can get stuffed as far as I'm concerned.