Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt

Re. MILLER v. ALBRIGHT, the petitioner never was a United States Citizen by birth as she failed to meet the requirements prescribed by statute. Therefore she was in essence demanding to be naturalized. This the Court rightly refused to do. Not on point. I will comment on other citations in due course.


131 posted on 01/26/2016 3:50:16 AM PST by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]


To: John Valentine
-- Re. MILLER v. ALBRIGHT, the petitioner never was a United States Citizen by birth as she failed to meet the requirements prescribed by statute. Therefore she was in essence demanding to be naturalized. This the Court rightly refused to do. Not on point. --

Not on point because she lost, but would have been on point if she won?

The dishonesty runs deep in you, Mr. Valentine, very deep.

136 posted on 01/26/2016 3:54:42 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson