Heidi didn't advance to the level of managing director at Goldman Sachs without agreeing with the organizational goals of those above her in the organization. If elected president, Ted would find all SORTS of reasons for agreeing with whatever advice Heidi would give him regarding GS.
I'd expect Ted to be doing whatever is in the best interests of Goldman Sachs as much as any president in history.
Saying that he isn't "owned" is just differing on the name you give to the relationship.
And Trump will clearly do whatever is in the best interest of the Trump corporation as managed by his children. Where are you going to find this magical president who has never worked for a corporation or whose spouse or children have never worked for a corporation? You can make up some silly conflict of interest for anybody.
As a conservative, I have never woken up in a cold sweat after a nightmare about Goldman Sachs. Destroying Goldman Sachs has never been a top agenda item for me. Why are they such a boogeyman suddenly, other than as a convenient line of attack against Cruz?
When has Cruz ever gone against a conservative position and gone with something Goldman Sachs wanted instead?
If Cruz governs pro-life, pro-gun, anti-NSA surveillance, anti-same-sex-marriage, tax-cutting, budget-balancing, nominating Scalia-like judges, anti-Obamacare, etc., I couldn’t care less if he outright sends a billion-dollar check to Goldman Sachs. It’d be a worthy trade-off.