Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sub-Driver
I never sent or received any material marked classified

Hillary isn't lying when she says this. That statement is her version of "it depends on what the definition "is" is. The word classified is a generic term that encompasses various levels of specific security markings such as "Confidential", "Secret" and "Top Secret" There are documents with these markings, but none marked with the word "Classified." Someone in the media needs to confront her on this and ask: "Did you ever send or receive any material specifically marked "Confidential", "Secret", or "Top Secret?" She will undoubtedly repeat that she never sent or received any material marked "Classified." At that point, she needs to again be confronted with the fact that there is no marking that uses the word "Classified" and asked again about the specific categories of markings that are used for secure information.

37 posted on 01/24/2016 10:47:27 AM PST by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GreenHornet

The media are pretty skilled at willful ignorance.


42 posted on 01/24/2016 11:28:44 AM PST by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: GreenHornet
I am sure all of the material she sent and received had the classifications stripped from them as part of a scheme. That however means absolutely nothing. As an originating authority and head of her department she should immediately be able to recognize classified material and question its arrival by unclassified means. Instead of doing her sworn duty she was doing the opposite. She orchestrated a conspiracy with her staff to circumvent the all of the protocols and safeguards for handling of that material.

I have never liked the removable secret drive type of computer because it makes it too easy to commit these types of criminal acts. I prefer those computers to be contained within a secure facility. None of this discussion, however would affect the TS/SCI/SAP data that was found on Clinton's email. The presence of that data indicates a complete compromise of the DoS handling of that level of data. If DoS cannot explain how that data got out of its physical safeguards the other departments should stop sharing that level of information with State. That should include having some other organization take over their management of TS/SCI/SAP for some period of time until State demonstrates the ability to manage their own security program.

It is scary that SAP and SCI data can be handled so carelessly. That is how info get leaked to the enemy and people, like ambassadors, get killed.

51 posted on 01/24/2016 12:08:16 PM PST by USNBandit (Sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson