[G Larry]

It’s a shame Phyllis Schlafly has been conned into believing Trump is pro-life.

[datricker]

I don't think Phyllis Schlafly should be shamed or has any latent shame she is not absorbing to be ashamed about.

She dressed the National Review down for the phonies they've been for at least 30 years... and Trumps the phony? ... good grief.

Its sad you cannot recognize a lifeboat when on a sinking ship. Even when those around you can.

If the NRO is the conservative voice then I'm gone.

Michal Medved alone is pseudo-con radical maxist, turned radical conservative now rabid establishment - these are the zeolots of social engineering.

I'm in the life boat with Phyllis and we be rowing

[Pravious]

“It’s a shame Phyllis Schlafly has been conned into believing Trump is pro-life.”

Conned, huh?

Tell me, what proof - what reasoning - what data to you have to doubt Trump when he’s repeatedly said that he’s pro-life and explained the reasons why he changed his mind about abortion several years ago?

Is it that you just don’t believe anything he says, and therefore when he says he’s pro-life he’s really pro-abortion and it’s all really a “con”? Could it just possibly be your belief doesn’t have the slightest basis in reality?

Anti-abortion people (and I’m one of them) should be THRILLED when hearts are won over to our side - not casting doubt on their conversion just because of some political bias.