When you are President you do not get “fair” and you do not pick your adversaries.
Suck it up Donald.
He isn’t President yet. But he will be and Megyn is not acceptable.
Trump needs to turn this lemon into lemonade and show that he can handle Megyn.
Trying to get to the nomination comes before the presidency.
For a debate sponsor to purposely rig a panel and engage an obviously biased brat, TWICE, who despised TRUMP before he ever stepped on her stage in the first debate, and who was happy to host TWO NIGHTS IN A ROW, the writers in the NR hit publication (who also hates TRUMP) is a pretty good argument for an objection to proffered.
I have not watched Me Again Kelly since the first debate, myself, and I am not a candidate fighting for the nomination.
To be an overt assassin against TRUMP and rule the stage as panelists do is as much about them as it is all the candidates.
She needs to go, and with any class, she would have recused herself, already.
Adversaries? His adversaries are on the stage. The moderator should not be an adversary.
Sucking it up is all very well and and good, but rolling over like a little submissive dog, doesn’t float my boat either.
If the media wants to dish it, then THEY, CAN DAMN WELL DEAL WITH THE PUSH BACK!
A very long overdue pushback IMHO.
And Miss Kelly is not immune. No free passes for the Presstitute corps.
Fair is Fair.
I see, including the debate moderator, an adversary. I am cool with that, you?
Mr. Trump has had to ‘ suck it up’ ....24/7 for the past 7 months!!!!!
Why don’t you try it.
MK is dead to me. I saw her interview with Rubio this past week. It was pathetic, any stooge could see the fluff and slobbering all over him compared to what she does to other candidates (Trump/ Cruz)
MK is dead to me. I saw her interview with Rubio this past week. It was pathetic, any stooge could see the fluff and slobbering all over him compared to what she does to other candidates (Trump/ Cruz)
When you play any game, other players are your “adversaries”. The referees or umpires are supposed to be neutral. They’re there to ensure that the game is played fairly.
When MK is interviewing guests on her show, she can be as adversarial as she wants to be. However, if she’s purporting to be a debate moderator, then she must be neutral.
It is fauxsnooze which is supposed to be “fair” and balanced afterall.
True, but shouldn't one be able to eliminate those that seek to question them on national TV if they are known to be biased against them? The MSM has stacked the deck for decades.
Trump’s not President, yet. And he deserves an equal playing field. Kelly hates Trump with a passion, how can she treat him the same as others on that stage.
I’m actually surprised they’re even going with her in the first place. Her feelings are hardly unknown, she uses her show to bash Trump continually.
When you are President you do not get “fair†and you do not pick your adversaries.
Suck it up Donald.
______________________________
Not true. Obama has done a fantastic job of limiting his appearances and reporter interactions with “friendly” reporters. Watch his press conferences.