That is cherry-picking the weakest and worst arguments made against him, like Stefan Molyneaux did in that hour plus video that some believe answers every criticism. It doesn't - all it does it answer the stupid, low-hanging fruit criticisms.
So forget the Hitler, dictator, racist criticisms, dumb, etc. criticisms. Forget Glenn Beck and others who make those stupid points.
What about his opposition to limiting entitlements? What about him calling Romney's plan to force illegals to self-deport "mean-spirited" and "crazy"? What about him saying that the government should pay to ensure everyone has health care? What about how forced mass deportations will all require Court hearings that would be backlogged for years even if you tripled the number of courts?
Remember Reagan was a democrat. And Clinton balanced the budget. G. W. Bush ran on the fact that our troupes were were all over the world and we should mind our own business. Obama, called our trillion dollar deficit unconscionable. Tell me what the hell is the cause and affect on what candidates say before they become elected and what they do afterwards. Because I don’t see the correlation.
Here is a correlation I do see. I see the republicans and the democrats enacting laws and playing the government as though the most important thing was to get more republicans or democrats elected. Tell me this, what conservative ideal was the Ryan budget supposed to imbibe. Or the same can be asked about the Bush/Hasert government’s laws.
Maybe its time for a guy who cares about the US more than he cares about the republican party. A guy who spends his own money. A guy who is hated by the media and the elites. Do you think I agree with everything Romney said or Rubio, or Christi. Certainly not.
And if I thought Cruz could be elected I may vote for him. But here is where you and I disagree strongly. I don’t think Cruz can get elected. And you probably do. Trump is 1 or 2 in every state and Cruz is 1 or 2 in only the most conservative states.