Attacking the messenger is a common logical fallacy. The words are Trump’s words. The positions are Trump’s positions.
The motives of those who assembled the video are clear; They, like I, would prefer to not see Trump as our candidate. So what? Who else is going to tell you that which ought to be fueling a growing sense of cognitive dissonance on your part? Trump surely won’t - he’s playing for the most powerful office in the world.
Proust did not even touch on that theme. Why have you? S’excuse, s’accuse?
“Attacking the messenger is a common logical fallacy. The words are Trump’s words. The positions are Trump’s positions.”
I’m glad there was no youtube in 1980. People would cut up videos of Reagan’s positions and spend big money promoting them.