Posted on 01/22/2016 1:44:30 PM PST by aquila48
"I WENT to the heart of darkness, Orania, the notorious white Afrikaner separatist apartheid enclave in precisely the middle of SA.
That, at least, given the prevailing narrative, was how I imagined it. Conceptions of Orania are so extreme that, last week, The Citizen (a newspaper created for apartheid propaganda in the 1970s), rejected a descriptive column about Orania by columnist Andrew Kenny. Having anything good to say about the place "might be interpreted ⦠as tacit glorification of segregation and ⦠offensive to victims of apartheid". It is not that the column was inherently offensive that was a problem â it was benignly descriptive â but the presumed inclination of readers to misconstrue truth.
...
When asked why there is such incendiary hatred of the idea that people characterised by real or imagined racism might be relegated to an isolated dot on a map, and why it is a problem rather than a solution, former anti-apartheid revolutionary Temba Nolutshungu said: "I imagine Orania to be an oasis in a desert. Its success is its problem. If it were a failure, it would be ignored. If Orania is allowed to succeed without black labour or government largess, it will debunk two politically tenacious narratives: that whites prosper on the backs of black labour, and that civilians need government welfare."
(Excerpt) Read more at bdlive.co.za ...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYbRZhymD5A
Apartheid never did make it without black labor.
Problem with multi-culturalism is its really anti-culturalism.
If you want to see hatred try walking in Detroit after dark.
There will always be a dominant culture, the question is, which one?
Yup. Our Western culture is superior.
But you’re waaaacist if you affirm that self-evident truth.
Interesting . . . and kind of pops the myth that the only reason whitey is successful is because he exploits poor minorities.
And how long did you live in RSA? Which history books have you read about RSA? And have you even EVER been to RSA ?
The whites in South Africa didn’t employ blacks because they had to. The did it because most blacks there couldn’t employ themselves and probably to try and make peace with the local African population.
South Africa, if it had been totally white, would have been just fine.
I mean this as a sincere question: Is there any part of Africa currently under black rule that is thriving?
Apartheid was an unworkable solution to this problem...
https://whitelocust.wordpress.com/2010/08/30/a-white-south-africa-%E2%80%93-what-went-wrong/
In 1980, White South Africa was acknowledged â even by her enemies â as the most powerful country on the African continent. Now, 25 years later, this White giant has collapsed and is in the hands of the ANC.
The Afrikaners, once masters of the country, are today a subject nation, ruled by people, who only 120 years ago, did not have the wheel. How did this happen? What happened to Apartheid? Why did that policy not guarantee White survival in that country? What went wrong?
Arthur Kemp provides the answer:
It is one of the many bitter ironies about South Africa that the policy of Apartheid â to which Afrikaners clung for decades as their only hope and salvation from Third World domination â was in fact an impracticable and unworkable system which led directly to the Afrikanersâ demise as a political force in that country. The politicians â the National Party â who fostered Apartheid, are the primary criminals in this tragedy, holding out a false illusory hope to the Afrikaners, and then when the inevitable became just that, changed track and gave in, abandoning their followers to ANC rule as callously as they had earlier lied to them.
- snip -
And...Orania is where all the hookers hang out in Berlin.
#SafeSpacesMatter?
No, in fact the power grid now routinely goes out. Rape and murder are off the charts. Food shortages. White farmers routinely are murdered in barbarous ways.
Good One !
(note that ALL are located in Southern, segregationist bastions!)
Plantation, Florida 98% Mentor, Ohio 97% Dubuque, Iowa 95% Parma, Ohio 95% Kettering, Ohio 94% Bismarck, North Dakota 94% Warwick, Rhode Island 94% Livonia, Michigan 94% Maple Grove, Minnesota 94% Weymouth, Massachusetts 94% Royal Oak, Michigan 94% Janesville, Wisconsin 94% Cheektowaga, New York 94% Minnetonka, Minnesota 94% Fargo, North Dakota 93% Palm Harbor, Florida 93% Levittown, Pennsylvania 93% Eau Claire, Wisconsin 93% Missoula, Montana 93% Council Bluffs, Iowa 93% Coon Rapids, Minnesota 92% Scranton, Pennsylvania 92% West Allis, Wisconsin 92% Duluth, Minnesota 92% Oshkosh, Wisconsin 92%
Not only that, but South Africa has its’ own problem with illegal immigrants, because to other Africans, South Africa, as bad of a condition as it may be in, is still light years ahead of most other African countries.
Bookmark
Funny thing is, and you'll never hear this repeated by those with an agenda to push, the part of Africa where the Dutch settled was largely empty or only inhabited by a small lighter skin tribe called the Khoi. I think they were nomadic. Then the Bantu, I believe, came though and killed most of them.
Now in South Africa, it is tens of millions pouring in from various tribes doing what tribes do.
And the Afrikaaners, mostly, sit in squatters camps, unable to work, build or create. Just trying to survive. It's criminal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.