Let me think...just which establishment candidate is a conservative. Oh, I see, none of them.
So, let’s see...the establishment has done nothing but lie to and deceive the GOP base and vote with the Democrats on every critical vote or conveniently no-show a vote.
They’ve done nothing to stop the Democrats moving “forward” with their atheistic Marxism and the reason is simply they are making money off of the deals...they have quite literally sold out the U.S.A. for personal gain and political and capital cronyism.
Somebody has to break the cycle and eliminate the influence of the most evil Cartel in the world today...the Washington Cartel.
Which candidate is positioned to make that desire a reality? Who is a true break from both that will win in the general?
I believe Trump will carry all fifty states and everyone knows he’s not a dyed in the wool conservative. He loves this country and he’s a strong leader and he will defend this nation and our allies. He rallies Democrats, Republicans, Independents, College students, Women, Business, veterans, Religious, Minorities and even some unions.
Who doesn’t like this man as a candidate for POTUS? Some conservatives who could only support the absolute most conservative in a race; atheistic Marxists; eugenicists; militant atheists; militant feminists; Islamists; Washington Cartel. These people aren’t that many in numbers...they buy their power with PACs, but it is not working this time. And, for the most part, I thank God it is not.
Well, for one, I don't.
The ravings of many of his supporters are on an emotional level because he has slapped the right faces and stepped on the right toes, for the most part.
If you don't think that he has spent plenty on marketing studies targeting the right things to say, the right people to gig, and the way to make the deal, you're naive. He has all that at his disposal and plenty of experience at it, otherwise he wouldn't be the deal maker he is.
However, that is already a giveaway. Making the deal with big corn in Iowa is a good peek at what is down the line. Saying the EPA could require more ethanol just means he isn't getting rid of the EPA, an agency that needs to go or be sharply curtailed. Saying we 'need' ethanol to avoid foreign oil is bogus, too. We passed Saudi Arabia in oil production despite the hostile actions of our own president and his minions--imagine what we could do with the Government even neutral and fair, not even behind the effort. We have the oil, but when we make deals with Iran that undercut the price of our crude oil and imported oil (from Canada, where we get the most), stop pipelines, etc. maybe ethanol seems like a good idea. It's crap for fuel, especially for engines that were not designed to run on it, and does not produce the MPG non-ethanol gasoline does.
But Trump has cut the deal with Big Corn, a taxpayer subsidized, government required industry, and already sold out every driver in the US, before a single vote has been cast.
Is that what you want to vote for? Apparently everything is on the table to make the deal.
I would rather be counted with a minority, if that is the case, who wants someone with principles. Character counts, not just stepping on the right toes.
Excellent post! We gave them a Republican Congress in 14 and they didn’t do anything with the power of the purse. They gave Obama everything he and the Marxists wanted. So I don’t care that they say I am not conservative or Trump’s not conservative! Trump is not a politician. I am going to vote for him.