Lovely statement, but what are you referring to? What would you consider "coherent"?
Ted needed money, he went to a bank, where they loan money out.
Trump needed money, he went to his Daddy. Not everyone can go borrow a million from Daddy, so they borrow from banks.
What's your point?
People borrow money. Big deal.
Daddy wasn’t financing a run for political office. Fish, barrel, dead.
Hey, let’s not mix apples and oranges here. Trump has borrowed from big banks; really, really big GREAT banks too, but it’s “different” when Trump borrows money - even if it’s from George Soros. We geniuses know that George Soros and people like him don’t expect ANYTHING in return for their money... /s/
Sorry, I tried, but I just can’t seem to make a coherent argument.