Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ek_hornbeck; Justa
Good points, ek.

But there is also the cultural distinction as well: the invaders were generally herdsmen, not farmers.

They would want to keep the farmers right where they were, producing - and just make sure that the rent and obeisance went to them instead of the rulers they displaced.

The notion of "total war" is about as new as the notion of "equality."

Wars were fought, for the most part, while the common peasants sat and watched.

20 posted on 01/20/2016 8:33:02 AM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: wideawake
The notion of "total war" is about as new as the notion of "equality."

The Third Punic War came close to the modern definition of "total war," and was effectively a genocide against the Carthaginians. There are several Biblical examples of total war as well.

22 posted on 01/20/2016 8:40:50 AM PST by ek_hornbeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: wideawake

“Wales was the primary Celtic holdout in Western Britannia during the ascendance of the Anglo-Saxons. Using computer analysis, the researchers explored how such a pattern could have arisen and concluded that a massive replacement of the native fourth-century male Britons had taken place.

http://harvardmagazine.com/2009/07/who-killed-the-men-england


40 posted on 01/20/2016 10:18:11 AM PST by Justa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson