It would have been only one, and that one was a rebuttal to your lengthy post. You were the trigger to me posting @19, on the proper way to read the
Naturalization Act of 1790. Then, @57, I rebutted your contention @53 that qualification was "manufactured to be a distraction." Again, it was you, in an effort to subvert the constitution, who made an assertion with the only purpose and point being on the subject of Cruz's qualification. Then you accuse me of "string pulling." Whatever that is, I don't know, but it doesn't matter.
At any rate, when you talk about Cruz's eligibility, don't be surprised to get a response on that subject. It's not my fault you take up defending Cruz qualifications.