Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ROCKLOBSTER

Most people who are taking Trump’s side on this seem to be troubled not by Cruz’s candidacy, but “the possibility of others.” So what sort of negative scenarios do you imagine coming from this?

And are you troubled by all the matters you’re not dealing with while you deal with this? I know I am.


73 posted on 01/19/2016 5:40:48 PM PST by Faith Presses On ("After this I beheld, and, lo, a great multitude, which no man could number, of all nations...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: Faith Presses On
Most people who are taking Trump's side on this seem to be troubled not by Cruz's candidacy, but "the possibility of others."

I'm not necessarily "taking Trump's side" but Sarah Palin is. What more can I say?

So what sort of negative scenarios do you imagine coming from this?

Well, with all of the dropouts, with Kasich whacking out, with JEB-the-useless thrashing around, ineligible anchor babies Rubio and Jindal (out) and the left-overs at the kiddies table, whaddya got left?

Since we already have the experience of an ineligible AND unqualified leftist under our belts, why the hell would you want to drive a stake through the heart of the original intent of the founders by putting up an ineligible candidate from our side. It makes us just as bad as the RATs.

It would forever nullify the elevated set of qualifications, required only for the highest elected position of power in the land.

75 posted on 01/19/2016 7:25:22 PM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson