Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Faith Presses On
The constitution settles this, if it is followed. Cruz is naturalized (therefore impossible to be NBC) and he knows it. So does the party that fraudulently certified he was qualified. It's like the person who sticks $10 spots on a $1 bill and tries to pass it off as a ten.

At any rate, what the founders actually did, that's in the constitution. Art IV, Sec. 2, 14th amendment, and a power to Congress to makes of naturalization. There is a body of law outside the constitution, more like legal principles (constitution is superior to a statute, due process includes you get to tell your side); and citizenship law between nations is one such body of ancient law. This body of law is WELL KNOWN, to lawyers.

50 posted on 01/19/2016 2:37:56 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt

Here’s a question your position can’t answer:

If the Constitution writers settled NBC as you say, and only naturalization was left to Congress (as if the two can be considered entirely separately) then why wasn’t the Naturalization Act of 1790 either challenged or even described as Unconstitutional? Why wasn’t it Unconstitutional for Congress to define NBC, and especially as it did?


52 posted on 01/19/2016 3:29:17 PM PST by Faith Presses On ("After this I beheld, and, lo, a great multitude, which no man could number, of all nations...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson