Replies

The dissenting justices in Rogers v. Bellei 401 U.S. 815 (1971) actually define it:

"...Afroyim's broad interpretation of the scope of the Citizenship Clause finds ample support in the language and history of the Fourteenth Amendment. Bellei was not "born . . . in the United States," but he was, constitutionally speaking, "naturalized in the United States." Although those Americans who acquire their citizenship under statutes conferring citizenship on the foreign-born children of citizens are not popularly thought of as naturalized citizens, the use of the word "naturalize" in this way has a considerable constitutional history. Congress is empowered by the Constitution to "establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization," Art. I, Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â§ 8. Anyone acquiring citizenship solely under the exercise of this power is, constitutionally speaking, a naturalized citizen

Also:

The Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution . . . contemplates two sources of citizenship, and two only: birth and naturalization. Citizenship by naturalization can only be acquired by naturalization under the authority and in the forms of law. But citizenship by birth is established by the mere fact of birth under the circumstances defined in the Constitution. Every person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof becomes at once a citizen of the United States, and needs no naturalization. A person born out of the jurisdiction of the United States can only become a citizen by being naturalized, either by treaty, as in the case of the annexation of foreign territory; or by authority of Congress, exercised either by declaring certain classes of persons to be citizens, as in the enactments conferring citizenship upon foreign-born children of citizens, or by enabling foreigners individually to become citizens by proceedings in the judicial tribunals, as in the ordinary provisions of the naturalization acts."

Yeah, more good cites. I didn't want to plug the place with too much, people don't even read the treads for crap, let alone a long post.

How in the dickens anybody can read this case for the proposition that Bellei was NBC truly is a mystery. Still, I've had a good number of people tell me that exactly what the case stands for. Being charitable, I figure it's ignorance and wishful thinking. But damn!!

We humans sure are wired funny.