Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: editor-surveyor; Cboldt; Ray76
Dicta from dissenting justices is not relevant

By the way, the definition of naturalized in the dissents opinion is not dicta since it directly addresses the specifics of the case before them, that being he had to be determined naturalized first before they could strip his citizenship from him.

198 posted on 01/21/2016 6:25:37 PM PST by TheCipher (Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself. Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]


To: TheCipher

Not so!

Dissenting opinion was in error!

Anyone can be stripped of their citizenship; remember Nolan? The man without a country?

The dissenters were nut cases.


201 posted on 01/21/2016 9:27:45 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]

To: TheCipher; Cboldt; Ray76

Not so!

Dissenting opinion was in error!

Anyone can be stripped of their citizenship; remember Nolan? The man without a country?

The dissenters were nut cases.


202 posted on 01/21/2016 9:30:20 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson