This is not seven years old:
from: Ted Cruz,s dishonesty on immigration
by Jon Ward, 12/16/15
“I have never supported legalization, and I do not intend to support it;” Cruz said, when questioned by Rubio.
In 2013, however, Cruz sponsored an amendment that would have allowed undocumented immigrants to remain in the United States permanently and obtain legal status, while eliminating a path to citizenship. It is very hard to square that effort with Cruz’s claim that he has “never supported legalization.”
That doesn’t stop him from trying, however. Cruz’s campaign said last month that his 2013 amendment was a “poison pill” intended to undercut the main legislation and reduce its chances of passing. By eliminating a path to citizenship, Cruz hoped to turn Democrats against the bill. Top Cruz spokesman Rick Tyler repeated the “poison pill” assertion after the debate Tuesday.
Set aside for a moment the fact that Cruz’s actual sponsorship of the amendment demonstrates a supposed commitment to legalizing undocumented immigrants that he now says was insincere.
At the time, Cruz was far from coy, instead representing himself as hopeful that his amendment would make it more — not less — likely for immigration legislation to become law.
“I don’t want immigration reform to fail. I want immigration reform to pass,” Cruz said in a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on May 21, 2013, the day that his amendment was voted down by the committee, 13 to 5.
Note the “I don’t want immigration reform to fail” statement that he made after his supposed poison pill amendment was voted down.l
It does if you're not brain dead and acknowledge that the "Trojan horse" of illegal immigration is that allowing the invaders to overwhelm Americans at the ballot box is the end of our country as we have known it.
Even a kindergartner can grasp the difference between "residency" and "citizenship!"
(That is, assuming that our elected criminals would never pass a "law" or an executive order eliminating citizenship as THE qualification for the vote.)
An objective accounting on amnesty and our candidates would point out the following.
Trump was for a legalization amnesty with no deportations for the non criminals with a consideration for a citizenship amnesty maybe later but not now, and that was in July of 2015.
After that it was deportations and a touchback amnesty for the good ones.
It's strange to recall how much we all demanded vetting of Obama. But, vetting Trump sets hair on fire. Bringing forth his own words from his own past elicits widespread panic.
Strange and sad and dangerous.