If Cruz had been born in Canada to a Canadian father between 1787 and 1922, he would’ve not only not been a natural born citizen, he wouldn’t have been a U.S. citizen at all, unless he later went through immigration. The idea that the Framers would consider someone who in their time wouldn’t have qualified for citizenship on any basis, a natural born citizen is preposterous. But if the Cruzers wan’t to perpetuate the whole “living, breathing Constitution” fraud, then they can continue to support this lie.
Please see post 114 by MamaTexan and mine at 126, the point is not about “living, breathing Constitution” it’s about the Framers considering an exception to the rule. And it’s not preposterous because they did not write the Constitution for their time only.