Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Safrguns

Yep, I think you’re right a Welfare Queen’s baby deserves the opportunity over a soldier overseas that fathered a child and later fought and died for his country.

It is estimated that there has been hundreds of thousands of children born aboard to military and support personal over the last 44 years. We should not trust these scum? If only they were born in America so we can ensure their loyalty.

At this moment there are over 150,000 military personal alone deployed. Thousands live with their families and have babies. Not only military but business leaders, doctors, students studying abroad, and countless loyal Americans might have a child overseas while ministering, studying, working, curing disease, making new discoveries, and traveling. I suppose none of these children are loyal either? Give me the child of someone that lived off the government tit their whole life.


41 posted on 01/18/2016 3:08:38 PM PST by BushCountry (Studies show that one out of three Liberals are as stupid as the other two.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: BushCountry

>>> Yep, I think you’re right a Welfare Queen’s baby deserves the opportunity over a soldier overseas that fathered a child and later fought and died for his country.

I didn’t say that, and your example does not apply.

First of all, a soldier overseas is not representative of a foreign government trying to exploit our electoral system.

Secondly, children born overseas to soldiers overseas are considered to be natural born. (military or other US base = US soil)


44 posted on 01/18/2016 4:27:45 PM PST by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson