Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Trump A Soros Decoy?
Helena Glass ^ | September 11, 2015 | Helena Glass

Posted on 01/18/2016 7:51:09 AM PST by justlittleoleme

Trump and the Clinton's enjoyed a tense friendship with Hillary attending Trump's wedding in 2005 and Trump giving upwards of $250,000 to the Clinton Foundation. While rumors are circulating that Trump is actually a plant to discombobulate the Republican voters, the axiom, 'divide and conquer' comes to mind.

Trump has changed political parties as often as Hillary changes her hair. From Democrat to Independent to Republican and a host of 'in-betweens', his changing ways are a bit unnerving. If he were actually, gasp, elected, would he become a Democrat while in office? The most telling would be finding a connection between Soros and Trump. It's hardly a secret that Soros has crossed party lines before, McCain is one example.

The media points to a party hosted by Nouriel Roubini in 2009 which was attended by George Soros, Trump, and Oliver Stone. Coincidentally, it was 2009 that Trump changed his party status from Democrat to Republican. Soros invested $160 million in Trump's Chicago skyscraper which was completed in 2009. In 2009, Trump Entertainment Resorts filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The largest holder of Trump's debt was Avenue Capital Group. At the time, Chelsea Clinton worked for the firm - 2006 to 2009. Marc Lasry, one of the co-founders of Avenue Capital is a strident backer of Hillary. In 2013, Lasry stepped down from Avenue Capital after Bill Clinton pushed Obama to name him as the new US Ambassador to France. Unfortunately, Lasry had to ultimately decline when he was found to be 'involved' in a money laundering international poker ring. Trumps daughter married orthodox Jewish businessman, Jared Kushner, in 2009. Trump adamantly claims no ties with - anyone. But sometimes, one protests too much, and we find the truth is far different.

Sabotaging the Republican party by creating a monstrous view of values and visions could help sway people to vote for the democrat candidate simply out of fear. If Republicans voted for Hillary in order to avoid voting for Trump, Hillary would have succeeded at something never before attempted. Faith in Republicans would virtually collapse, and the perfect staged play would bow in reverence.

So while Hillary is groveling and Trump is loudly lauding himself, Soros is laughing and the country is cringing.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: soros; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
http://pagesix.com/2009/12/25/sightings-790/

Oliver Stone holding court with billionaires Donald Trump, George Soros and Steve Schwarzman at a private party hosted by Nouriel Roubini — nicknamed “Dr. Doom,” for predicting the economic crisis

1 posted on 01/18/2016 7:51:09 AM PST by justlittleoleme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: justlittleoleme

No


2 posted on 01/18/2016 7:52:59 AM PST by bjcoop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justlittleoleme

DT is what one wants him to be, exactly like Bambi in 2008.


3 posted on 01/18/2016 7:54:10 AM PST by libbylu (Cruz: The truth with a smile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justlittleoleme

>>would he become a Democrat while in office?

It’s 2016. The terms “Republican” and “Democrat” are meaningless in this era of the UniParty and have been for over a decade. The competing ideologies in America are now Progressive and Not Progressive.


4 posted on 01/18/2016 7:55:44 AM PST by Bryanw92 (Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justlittleoleme

Trump is the original wild card. He is so much the antithesis of Obama the electorate will vote for him if only to get the taste of Marxism out of their mouth. Trump is, after all, a master entrepreneur.
The best that can be said is that we will not know what Trump will do until he is in office. He is uncontrolled by any known influence.


5 posted on 01/18/2016 7:56:16 AM PST by Louis Foxwell (Stop Islam and save the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justlittleoleme

Bflr


6 posted on 01/18/2016 7:56:28 AM PST by sauropod (I am His and He is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libbylu

All you do is attack Trump


7 posted on 01/18/2016 7:57:10 AM PST by bjcoop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: justlittleoleme

Money laundering & bankruptcy fraud involving Soros’s invisible interest in Conseco & the GM bldg

Law Offices of David H. Relkin, Esq. on behalf of Leslie Dick Worldwide Ltd. has filed a Federal RICO Complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 08-CV-7900) against George Soros, Deutsche Bank, Vornado Realty Trust, Fortress Investment Group, Donald J. Trump & 12 other RICO conspirators for $4.2 Billion in damages.

The unlawful Money Laundering through the sale of the General Motors Building, orchestrated and carried out by the RICO Enterprise, including George Soros, Soros Fund Management, SFM Management, Vornado Realty Trust, German American Capital, Fortress Investment Group, Donald J. Trump, and the RICO conspirators Conseco, Deutsche Bank, Lazard, Eastdil Realty, Harry Macklowe, Cerberus Capital Management, Lazard, Kirkland & Ellis, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, Carmel Fifth and 767 Manager, and, upon information and belief, other members of the Enterprise and co-conspirators, operated through a pattern of racketeering and forms one of the cornerstones of the defendants’ illicit activities of Money Laundering and Bankruptcy Fraud, predicate acts of RICO alleged herein and Bid Rigging.

http://www.mmdnewswire.com/money-laundering-a-bankruptcy-fraud-involving-soross-invisible-interest-in-conseco-a-the-gm-bldg-3993.html


8 posted on 01/18/2016 7:57:12 AM PST by justlittleoleme (Cruz or Lose. Trump is a progressive populist liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bryanw92
“The competing ideologies in America are now Progressive and Not Progressive.”

Yes, and unfortunately, full-bore communism and at the least European socialism are included and embraced under the Progressive umbrella.

9 posted on 01/18/2016 7:58:49 AM PST by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: justlittleoleme

Yes. He says the right things, but what he promises are not guaranteed. Surpringly,he will NOT be king and unless he is as lawless as Obama with executive orders, it’s all just talk to get votes.

Trump advocates are rabid...like Obama’s people. Trump just has not built his temple yet.


10 posted on 01/18/2016 7:59:50 AM PST by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justlittleoleme

Trump Derangement Syndrome. It’s YUGE.


11 posted on 01/18/2016 8:00:29 AM PST by McGruff (Born In The USA...Born In The USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justlittleoleme

No, but Helena Glass is.


12 posted on 01/18/2016 8:01:18 AM PST by Redleg Duke (The Federal Government is nothing but a welfare program with a dress code!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pieceofthepuzzle

>>Yes, and unfortunately, full-bore communism and at the least European socialism are included and embraced under the Progressive umbrella.

Yes, they are. Progressivism is the kinder, gentler version. European Socialism is the goal. Full-bore Communism will be the unintended consequence when socialism runs out of OPM.


13 posted on 01/18/2016 8:01:25 AM PST by Bryanw92 (Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: justlittleoleme

No.

BTW, you know Ted is a globalist who runs with the CFR and is in bed with the big international banks, right?


14 posted on 01/18/2016 8:01:45 AM PST by Yashcheritsiy (What good is a constitution if you don't have a country to go with it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justlittleoleme

Don’t know but I know Trump is not conservative and will flip-flop over and over again and say anything the crowd wants to hear.


15 posted on 01/18/2016 8:04:27 AM PST by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison10

“Trump advocates are rabid...like Obama’s people.”

I suspect many were Paulistas. Remember how “rabid” they were?


16 posted on 01/18/2016 8:05:35 AM PST by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bjcoop

That may be, but given the number of attacks on Cruz here on FR and elsewhere, I guess turnabout is fair play is it not?


17 posted on 01/18/2016 8:06:39 AM PST by ManHunter (You can run, but you'll only die tired... Army snipers: Reach out and touch someone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: justlittleoleme

Bill Clinton never got 50% of the vote, but was elected twice by having a populist billionaire divide the opposition. Having seen that formula work twice would it be surprising they’d try it a third time?


18 posted on 01/18/2016 8:07:03 AM PST by JohnBovenmyer (Obama been Liberal. Hope Changed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

Not this again. Beck, let it be. Trump isn’t a democrat staking horse for Hillary.


19 posted on 01/18/2016 8:09:56 AM PST by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll Onward! Ride to the sound of the guns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: justlittleoleme

Nonsense.

Compare the alternatives:
- A multi-billionaire with gigantic ego is offered _how_much_? to enter the political ring and play patsy/puppet for _who_?
- A multi-billionaire with experience running large organizations enters the political ring and has a very realistic chance of winning the opportunity to run the most powerful organization on the planet.

The former is absurd. Nobody else has the money to “buy” Trump; at best (and at tremendous personal cost) a few could pay him enough to get his attention, but his personal nature is to EARN that money, lots of it, and not to just “sell out”.

The latter is compelling. Even if Trump _did_ jump in with the intention of being a paid patsy/puppet, the fact that he’s in a position to trounce EVERYONE pursuing the POTUS chair is _far_ more attractive, profitable, and historic.

Be history or make history - which would YOU choose? which do you think Trump is choosing? duh.


20 posted on 01/18/2016 8:10:30 AM PST by ctdonath2 (History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the week or the timid. - Ike)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson