Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I hate the use of feed grains for the production of fuel. My cars would get much better efficiency with gasoline: Ethanol (E100) consumption in an engine is approximately 51% higher than for gasoline since the energy per unit volume of ethanol is 34% lower than for gasoline.


3 posted on 01/18/2016 1:04:40 AM PST by jonrick46 (The Left has a mental disorder: A totalitarian mindset..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jonrick46

Jonrick46, did you vote for the corn based?


4 posted on 01/18/2016 1:06:30 AM PST by RedHeeler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: jonrick46

It is time and past time that any subsidy for converting feed grains into alcohol (ethanol) for motor fuel to be abolished.

If alcohol is that good a thing for a motor fuel, then it is easier, cheaper and far more feasible to convert a fraction of natural gas, ethylene, to 95% ethanol. This is already done on an industrial scale throughout the world.

For technical reasons, it is difficult to produce 100% ethanol, as the distillation and condensation point of ethanol-water mixture is LOWER than 100% totally water-free alone, and in an open container, the additional water is reabsorbed from the atmosphere until the equilibrium point of 95% purity is again achieved.


16 posted on 01/18/2016 1:52:17 AM PST by alloysteel (If I considered the consequences of my actions, I would rarely do anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson