To: John Valentine
Is an “anchor baby” a citizen by birth?
38 posted on
01/17/2016 4:50:40 PM PST by
moonhawk
(What would he do differently if he WAS a muslim?)
To: moonhawk
Under present law and precedent an anchor baby is not only a citizen by birth, its a natural born citizen.
You can thank a series of moronic Supreme Court decisions elevating jus soli and disparaging jus sanguinis, in total disregard for the views of the Framers, for this particular outrage.
53 posted on
01/17/2016 4:56:41 PM PST by
John Valentine
(Deep in the Heart of Texas)
To: moonhawk; John Valentine
Is an "anchor baby" a citizen by birth?That is the first thing that should be clarified.
Maybe the solution is to no longer allow "anchor babies".
Allowing foreigners to illegally enter our country, and use our medical services for free, and then giving the newborn child of foreign parents citizenship is just stupid.
55 posted on
01/17/2016 4:57:17 PM PST by
UCANSEE2
(Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
To: moonhawk
Yes. By statute. And an anchor baby can be president for that reason.
104 posted on
01/17/2016 5:09:49 PM PST by
WENDLE
(Trump is not bought . He is no puppet.)
To: moonhawk
Were Princess Grace's children citizen when they drew their first breath?
318 posted on
01/17/2016 7:51:48 PM PST by
wintertime
(Stop treating government teachers like they are reincarnated Mother Teresas!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson