Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Walt Griffith

That was said In Dicta and not part of the decision.


2 posted on 01/17/2016 3:35:03 PM PST by Perdogg (Senator Ted Cruz - President 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Perdogg

It was included in the final of “United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)” and is a part of the story of the case. That is what counts here.


11 posted on 01/17/2016 3:44:53 PM PST by Walt Griffith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg
"That was said In Dicta and not part of the decision."

That does not mean it doesn't exist.

15 posted on 01/17/2016 3:47:40 PM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg
That was said In Dicta and not part of the decision.

You are correct. Wong Ark Kim is not relevant to the issue. Dicta is not a decision, but merely opining. I still support Ted Cruz because I think we live in a post Constitutional society (see Obama with nearly everything) and we need someone who has the intellect to set up back on the path to the Constitution. And that is Ted Cruz.

Ideally, I think the military should take over and a Pinochet type character should rule until America comes to its senses, but I don't see that happening.

76 posted on 01/17/2016 5:03:17 PM PST by Stepan12 (Our present appeasementof Islam is the Stockholm Syndrome on steroids.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson