Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cruz Releases Video Of Trump Talking New York Values And Partial Birth Abortion Support
Redstate ^ | 1/16/2016 | Jay Caruso

Posted on 01/16/2016 10:43:21 AM PST by TBBT

Ted Cruz has taken more heat for his comments about “New York values” than he has anything else he has said since he was elected in 2012. Naturally, since most of the mainstream media is based out of New York, it has been high horse riding time as so many have gotten their panties in a wad over the comments. Ironically, they take more offense at what Cruz said than in Donald Trump’s blatant birtherism. Being a birther is cool now that it’s not Barack Obama who is the subject of Trump’s comments.

Unfortunately for Trump, who deftly (but at the same time shamelessly) evoked 9/11 as a means of responding to Ted Cruz’s comments, he cannot escape the very things he has said over the course of the last 15 years. Trump, as I have said on prior occasions is a charlatan. He is not a conservative at all. He is not now and never has been one. Outside of immigration (which is far more based on phony populism than policy), his views on taxes, healthcare, foreign policy and trade carry all the hallmarks of a progressive Democrat.

(Excerpt) Read more at redstate.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: canadian; cruz; ineligible; nyvalues; tds; trump; usualsuspect
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360361-380 next last
To: HarleyLady27

So, you are pro abortion. That explains a lot.


341 posted on 01/16/2016 6:05:36 PM PST by dschapin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

“He voted for a procedural rule that 98 other Senators voted for.”

Cruz voted for the bill to become law. Cruz voted for the bill in the same fashion any bill is voted on to become law.

“So the Corker Amendment means nothing anyway.”

That is nonsense, of course, but for the sake of argument, if that is true, then why is Cruz going about the country condemning the bill and why does he say that the first thing he will do if he becomes president is to get rid of it if it is not law?


342 posted on 01/16/2016 6:11:25 PM PST by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

It was done on worldwide TV out of the EU. Very legal. You can thank Obama.


343 posted on 01/16/2016 6:12:39 PM PST by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

This proves you’re wrong regarding Vattel.

https://www.courtlistener.com/?q=Vattel&type=o&stat_Precedential=on&order_by=score+desc


344 posted on 01/16/2016 6:26:34 PM PST by bushpilot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot2

So Vattel is God?


345 posted on 01/16/2016 6:29:16 PM PST by P-Marlowe (Tagline pending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot2

Wow, You are going to cite the Dred Scott decision which struck down any state laws against slavery (widely considered one of the worst and most political of all Supreme Court Decisions) as an example of the Supreme Court relying on Vattel’s work. I am sorry but that is just as bad as citing Roe v. Wade in your defense.


346 posted on 01/16/2016 6:29:58 PM PST by dschapin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies]

To: grania

TruMp said he has never asked for forgiveness because he doesn’t need it. Explain to me how any Christian would ever say such a thing.


347 posted on 01/16/2016 6:31:00 PM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
Ted Cruz ineligibility isn't limited to Vattel.  photo image_zps5r20sqch.jpeg  photo image_zps1hbkpg7f.jpeg
348 posted on 01/16/2016 6:34:31 PM PST by bushpilot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: odawg

Its very simple actually. Obama said he would do the Iran deal and release the money without involving congress at all. Cruz wanted Congress to do something to slow Obama down. He tried to amend the Corker bill to put real teath into in. After his amendment failed he decided to ultimately vote for Corker because it at least would force Obama to wait for a period of time before he could release the money. Cruz hoped that with that time they might be able to come up with some additional ways to block Obama and run out the clock.


349 posted on 01/16/2016 6:35:35 PM PST by dschapin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
Continually in the hands....  photo image_zps6esr5a2x.png
350 posted on 01/16/2016 6:43:49 PM PST by bushpilot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot2
Ted Cruz ineligibility isn't limited to Vattel.

Why is Trump more preferable to you than Cruz as President?

If the Supreme Court ruled that Cruz is a Natural Born Citizen, would you start supporting him?

You know the Supreme Court ruled that Black People, even those born free were not citizens of the United States at all.

The Supreme Court also ruled that unborn children are not human beings.

You think he's not eligible, then don't vote for him. Don't go crying to the Supreme Court to solve this issue. They have no standing and no jurisdiction. Read the 20th Amendment.

351 posted on 01/16/2016 6:47:09 PM PST by P-Marlowe (Tagline pending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
Rogers v Bellei, 1971. Child born abroad citizen mom alien dad.  photo image_zps0haigbd8.jpeg
352 posted on 01/16/2016 6:56:14 PM PST by bushpilot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies]

To: jobim; CatherineofAragon; Finny; BlackElk; TADSLOS

Just look at the number of Freepers now open about their pro choice positions, their sudden embracing of political moderation, setting aside of conservative principles, YET AGAIN, to pursue victory and not caring at all what that victory might come at the cost of. the number that flat out say winning is all they care about.

They completely reject factual data based on a given publication or commentator’s ‘offense’ to Donald Trump and in the last 3 days alone, have underbussed and condemned double digits worth of said commentators including Levin, Daniel Horowitz and Rush, SOLELY because they spoke against the actions of the object of their adoration. Not even Ronald Reagan was safe and was painted retroactively as a champion of Abortion.

We have among us an open Bill Clinton supporter that post like a madwoman in support of Trump and no one cares or sees the obvious contradiction.

We have many posters that are trying to destroy a conservative, AGAIN, to support their at best, moderate. And resorting to full on Saul Alynski tactics to do it. People, I would add, that praised Cruz not even a year ago.

I’d say it’s all pretty apparent. Nothing cryptic about it. Right out in the open for anyone that cares to look. Pick a handful of random threads. It’s all right there plain as day.


353 posted on 01/16/2016 6:57:51 PM PST by Norm Lenhart (Existential Cage Theory - An idea whose time has come)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: GOPe Means Bend Over Spell Run

Funny how all these Trump trolls all signed up in Aug 2015, can you say agitprop. I knew you can.


354 posted on 01/16/2016 6:59:05 PM PST by Leto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
Purpose 1952 Naturalization Act....."admission of aliens".....  photo image_zpsz3vpfoks.png
355 posted on 01/16/2016 7:01:11 PM PST by bushpilot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot2

Why do you support Trump?

Is there any other candidate in this race that has actually contributed to Hillary Clinton’s presidential and senatorial campaigns?


356 posted on 01/16/2016 7:02:50 PM PST by P-Marlowe (Tagline pending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: Leto

Go yo Alexa and look at FR’s stats. Then ask toyr self two questions. Why is it that FR has a large traffic flow coming from India. Second, why do so many Twitter fans of DT type in broken English?

What does this website offer to a large number of Indian people that would cause them to come here?


357 posted on 01/16/2016 7:04:17 PM PST by Norm Lenhart (Existential Cage Theory - An idea whose time has come)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 354 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot2

Isn’t that the exact same Supreme Court that said that unborn children are not human beings?


358 posted on 01/16/2016 7:04:26 PM PST by P-Marlowe (Tagline pending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 352 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

I support the Constitution not a political character.


359 posted on 01/16/2016 7:10:30 PM PST by bushpilot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot2

If it comes down to Ted Cruz or Hillary Clinton, which one gets your precious vote?


360 posted on 01/16/2016 7:13:29 PM PST by P-Marlowe (Tagline pending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 359 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360361-380 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson