Also explains what Hillary was doing when she was supposed to be monitoring crucial aspects of US ntl security...including protecting the lives of her employees in Benghazi.
All the behind-the-scenes data (that she tried to keep hidden from taxpayers) indicates the only thing she WAS on top of was any and all State Dept insider info on which she and Bill could make a buck.
Some enterprising reporter itching for a Pulitzer needs to match-up Hillarys official State Dept moves w/ the Clintons' vast buck-raking operation. That tell$ the whole $tory in exqui$ite detail.
That is great - but to me the real story of “the Clintons’ vast buck-raking operation” is that the Constitution presumes that any money going to a federal employee from a foreign government is corrupt. It takes an act of Congress to rebut that presumption:Hillary cannot prove the negative that her buck-raking operation was not corrupt - and the burden of proof lies with her. She should be divested of control of all foreign government money which came into her control. Every dime. Or else she should prove that negative - to a majority of both the House and the Senate (and, FWIW, the POTUS).
- Article 1 Section 9:
- No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state
Every candidate for nomination as POTUS (by any party) should argue in every state that the legislature should pass a law enforcing the above constitutional provision against any and all presidential candidates by keeping violators’ names off the presidential ballot.
I think, based on what I heard last week, some enterprising FBI agents are working on that.