Yes, Ted Cruz Did Disclose That Loan, the New York Times Just Didn’t Report It

Red State ^ | January 14th, 2016 | streiff

[ScottinVA]

Yeah, that’s a no-no on a government form

Yes... so off with his head.

[xzins]

I was sort of hoping for an honorable reason.

[Pajamajan]

"is this all ya got?" Really. You investigate a man's financial disclosure and the best you can come up with to justify your labor is a loan that was disclosed on one report and not disclosed on a second report, but was not improper in any other respect?

This is all they got-distortions and out right lies.

[Cincinatus' Wife]

You knew the Slimes would spin it to hurt a conservative when there was nothing there-there. My question is was it Trump, Bush, Chrispy Kreme, the Huckster or the Rube who planted this hit job load of BS?

I guess the Bush machine.

[Pajamajan]

I would bet the Bush machine is behind this stupid nothing.

[calisurfer]

Cruz is toast...he will not survive this.

[PJBankard]

No, I didn’t say that. The form is obviously not the one that was filed with the FEC. Yes he may have disclosed his loan to the public or on other forms but not to the FEC as required. Any consequence of failing to do so is his to bear.

[HollyB]

That is minor stuff and the average person is not concerned with those type of details. People have become so desensitized that it’s going to take a lot to change their minds. Most people already have their minds made up on who they ‘don’t’ like.

[Carry_Okie]

I don't follow your question

Start here. Ask yourself: How many would this employer of Spanish speaking cooks, dishwashers, maids, groundskeepers, and construction workers call "the good ones"? Do you really think he's going to commit economic suicide?

Try this for more depth.

[ifinnegan]

You did not really make it more clear, but I figured it out.

You are saying Trump will normalize so many current illegals as citizens, who can vote and will vote for Dems, that it won’t matter if the GOPe is marginalized.

You are saying Trump will create a permanent Democrat majority if elected.

Correct?

[UncleSam]

I recall the time we borrowed against our brokerage account to help purchase a new home. I was able to borrow up to half the value of the account.

Well, we did just that and wouldn’t you know that within a short while before I was able to close out the loan the market made an adjustment and margin calls started to flow in. What a mess.

So, ted borrowing 1,000,000.000 was against a brokerage account worth in excess of 2,000.000.000.

Not a good idea even though the wife being the big breadwinner was probably at the 300,000.000 income level at the time.

[Carry_Okie]

Correct.

[BobL]

As you’re getting at, the FEC dates exist FOR A REASON, and to ‘forget’ to include something on a report, whether on purpose or not, provides the same level of deception, and the appearance of trying to get around the law.

I still like Cruz, but his non-disclosure, intentional or not, did help him in an unfair way, and that is a LEGITIMATE story.

[American Constitutionalist]

Yes, something doesn’t add up here, and they are the ones who supposedly the ones who can’t stand the media, but they work in tandem with the media to take Ted Cruz down.

[Arthur Wildfire! March]

After I was ambarassed by the Breitbart ‘drive-by’ report about Cruz’ mom being registered to vote [seems debunked to me], I’m feeling more cautious now about this issue. You really seem to master the facts here.

So ...

Update: Cruz Did In Fact Disclose the Goldman Sachs Loan
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3383599/posts

That is a dishonest title, right? A watered down disclosure that was NOT to the FEC. And Red State is essentially being dishonest?