Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LORD: David Brooks’ Disgraceful Attack on Ted Cruz
conservativereview.com ^ | 1/13/16 | Jeffrey Lord

Posted on 01/13/2016 4:30:01 PM PST by cotton1706

It was perhaps the lowest moment in Senator Edward Kennedy's career.

Shortly after President Reagan nominated Judge Robert Bork - a highly distinguished former US Solicitor General and Yale Law professor - to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1987, Kennedy took to the senate floor to attack the conservative Bork as follows:

Robert Bork's America is a land in which women would be forced into back-alley abortions, blacks would sit at segregated lunch counters, rogue police could break down citizens' doors in midnight raids, schoolchildren could not be taught about evolution, writers and artists could be censored at the whim of the Government, and the doors of the Federal courts would be shut on the fingers of millions of citizens.

The attack was as dishonest as it was disgraceful. The first strike in a new technique on the judicial confirmation scene that became known ever afterward as "borking"-spreading smears and lies about the target in question. Yet liberalism having long since begun its descent into the fever swamps, Kennedy's attack was emblematic of the emotionalism and outright dishonesty - not to mention appeals to race -that were already typical of the progressive movement.

Who could ever imagine that similar dishonest and disgraceful sentiments would come from a supposed "conservative" columnist in an attack on, of all people, the decidedly conservative Ted Cruz? Wonder no longer. Over there at - you guessed it - the New York Times, the "conservative" columnist of record, David Brooks, has mounted a Kennedy-style attack on Senator Cruz. Brooks has become a Borker.

(Excerpt) Read more at conservativereview.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cruz; davidbrooks; elections

1 posted on 01/13/2016 4:30:01 PM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Excellent column


2 posted on 01/13/2016 4:32:45 PM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
Colin Powell and David Brooks----> "Republicans" who voted for Obola...twice.
3 posted on 01/13/2016 4:33:12 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (Obamanomics:Trickle Up Poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
David Brooks is an unapologetic scoundrel, doing the rabid left’s dirty work at their beck and call. He has no shame and is incapable of it, just as he has no conscience.
4 posted on 01/13/2016 4:39:38 PM PST by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

David Brooks is a liberal elitist columnist for the leading progressive newspaper. If he was ever a conservative he sold out long ago for his 30 pieces of silver and a byline from the NY Times.

The events of recent years have demonstrated that most members of the elite who call themselves conservatives, give their allegiance first to their social class and second to the global progressive movement. David Brooks, the Bush family, John McCain, John Roberts, John Boehner, Mitch McConnell, Paul Ryan, Mitt Romney and most GOP members of Congress are elitists, not conservatives, not Americans, and not patriots. Patriots would not enable Barack Obama and the Democrat party. True American patriots would not remain silent, as both Bush former presidents have done, while a rogue POTUS ignored the Constitution and ruled by decree.


5 posted on 01/13/2016 4:43:45 PM PST by Soul of the South (Tomorrow is gone. Today will be what we make of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
The elites are trying to get us to march like zombies into a bottomless death-pit.

Anyone who questions this strategy, or offers an alternative, is excoriated and shunned by the smart people.

6 posted on 01/13/2016 4:46:55 PM PST by Steely Tom (Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

I, and many more, are so angry at the media, the GOP and the left.. with obama in that mix also.. that there is nothing they can say to lower Trump’s or Cruz’s numbers in the polls. Every time they try, the numbers go up. They do not get this YET.. I so dislike the past 7+ years and what they have allowed/protected/promoted... that NOTHING matters but to get someone to UNDO all this mess. The last year may be the worst yet... they plan on leaving in a blaze... and Trump is going to have his hands full... but I bet he gets on it the first day! If it were a GOPer, they’d let it all stand.

The only ones that might be able to take each of them out,.. is each other. Maybe, perhaps.. not even sure about that.


7 posted on 01/13/2016 4:47:08 PM PST by frnewsjunkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
I mark the Bork hearings as the end of my 'D' days and starting me on the right path.

I don't think that point was the lowest point in Ted's career. Seems to me he was underwater for awhile and that is pretty low as well.

8 posted on 01/13/2016 4:48:38 PM PST by Michael.SF. (That was the gift the president gave us, the gift of happiness, of being together,' Cindy Sheehan")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

I thought Jeffrey Lord hates Cruz.


9 posted on 01/13/2016 4:50:14 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soul of the South
If he was ever a conservative he sold out long ago for his 30 pieces of silver and a byline from the NY Times.

Tough to say what he was. Brooks wrote a parody of William F. Buckley and Buckley gave him a job, which led to other jobs. It wasn't hard to be against Jimmy Carter in 1980. A lot of people who were have rejoined the Democrats since then. Just how strong David Brook's convictions might have been -- I'd say not very much.

True American patriots would not remain silent, as both Bush former presidents have done, while a rogue POTUS ignored the Constitution and ruled by decree.

Ex-presidents are like constitutional monarchs. Whatever influence they have depends on their not trying to use it all the time. If the Bushes were screaming about Obama everyday no one would listen. And considering how popular GWB was after leaving office, it's probably just as well he remains on the sidelines.

FWIW: Brooks was born in Canada to at least one American parent, so maybe we'll be hearing more about his own political ambitions as time goes on.

10 posted on 01/13/2016 4:58:17 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

I’d forgotten that David Brooks was still a republican. HA! Thought he “converted” years ago.


11 posted on 01/13/2016 5:56:57 PM PST by Shery (Pray for righteousness to be restored and for the peace of Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

No one takes David Brooks seriously anymore. He is the NYT House Conservative and only writes for the clueless elites in NYC and DC


12 posted on 01/14/2016 1:52:02 AM PST by AdaGray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson