Posted on 01/12/2016 10:55:55 AM PST by SeekAndFind
At the beginning of every year, the Pope delivers an address in Rome to welcome the foreign diplomatic corps accredited to the Vatican. Pope Francis, a nice guy, has just delivered such a speech. It deserves attention.
The main theme of Francis's speech is immigration, the mass movement of peoples, now this way and now that, for "mobility is part of our human nature" and "human history is made up of countless migrations." True enough. But Pope Francis neglects to discuss what is for some of us so disturbing about the current migration into Europe: the numbers and nature of these migrants, coming from exactly where, trying to get exactly where, and carrying exactly what in their mental baggage.
The Pope does allude vaguely to "the grave crisis of migration" -- but he is sure that those migrants who are true to their faith, whatever that faith may be (the word "Islam" does not occur anywhere in his long speech; the word "Muslim" occurs exactly once), are not the problem. For "every authentic practice of religion cannot fail to promote peace."
This is an assertion for which no evidence is adduced, and no one, not even a Pope, is exempt from the need to offer such evidence. After all, a large part of European history has involved wars of religion. I suppose that weasel word "authentic" provides an out for the Pope: simply label as "inauthentic" any "practice of religion" that fails to "promote peace."
Does that ipse dixit satisfy you? Would you not find more to your liking a pope who, before making such a remark, would have read, studied, and thoroughly assimilated the texts of Islam -- Qur'an, Hadith, and Sira -- which guide the "practice of Islam"? And if Pope Francis had done that, of course, he could not possibly have made such a preposterous remark in the first place.
Pope Francis continues in this dismal vein: "Only a distorted ideological form of religion [?] can think that justice is done in the name of the Almighty by deliberately slaughtering defenceless persons, as in the brutal terrorist attacks which occurred in recent months in Africa, Europe, and the Middle East." All of those attacks, of course, were carried out by Muslims, in the name of Islam, relying on and often citing supporting passages in the Qur'an, against non-Muslims. All followed the example of Muhammad, that Perfect Man whose words and deeds are set out in the Hadith and Sira. There is nothing "distorted" about this form of Islam, even if it is not to our liking. It might have helped clear up confusion had he dared to mention, suggest, hint, that what we call the "deliberate slaughter of defenceless [non-Muslim] persons" is something quite different to the Muslims who murdered, or who approved of the murder, of those Infidels.
For the Pope, the current mass migrations into Europe evoke other migrations or movements, all the way back to Adam and Eve -- "From the banishment from Eden to Abraham's journey…." And those past migrations were characterized by the same "struggles and sufferings, the desires and hopes, which are shared by the hundreds of thousands of persons on the move today, possessed of the same determination which Moses had to reach a land flowing with ‘milk and honey' (cf. Ex. 3:17), a land of freedom and peace." For "milk and honey," read "free or subsidized housing, and medical care, and education, and other generous welfare benefits" offered these migrants, especially in northern Europe, which is why Muslims by the hundreds of thousands try to end up there, ideally in Germany or Scandinavia. For "freedom and peace," read Sharia and Jihad.
According to the Pope, "many migrants from Asia and Africa see in Europe a beacon for principles such as equality before the law and for values inherent in human nature, including the inviolable dignity and equality of every person, love of neighbor regardless of origin or affiliation, freedom of conscience and solidarity towards our fellow men and women." Yes, how true. Those are exactly the principles -- equality before the law and the "values, including the inviolable dignity and equality of every person" -- that have made Europe a beacon for Muslims. And by now we are all deeply familiar, too, with the Muslim migrants' deep "love of neighbor regardless of origin or affiliation" and desire for "freedom of conscience, and solidarity" in Paris and Madrid, in Amsterdam and London, in Cologne and Toulouse, indeed all over Europe.
But if the Muslim migrants to Europe want nothing, according to the Pope, save to come and practice "love thy neighbor," he cannot be as sanguine about Europeans themselves. The Pope is worried -- worried about the attitudes and behavior of these same Europeans: "There should be no loss of the values and principles of humanity, respect for the dignity of every person, mutual subsidiarity and solidarity, however much they may prove a burden difficult to bear." For the Europeans bear "a moral responsibility to…ensure assistance and acceptance" of migrants.
No. There is no responsibility either to "ensure assistance to" or to accept migrants, from anywhere, in any number. And it is grotesque to demand of Europeans that they accept migrants who are opposed to everything Western civilization favors, including freedom of thought and conscience, equality of the sexes, especially none when the migrants in question are raised up in the firm, even fanatical faith, that those principles are the enemy.
Pope Francis laments the "vacuum of ideals and the loss of identity" which he says "dramatically marks the so-called West." And in that "so-called West," that "vacuum gives rise to the fear which leads to seeing the other as a threat and an enemy, to closed-mindedness and intransigence in defending preconceived notions." It's the Europeans who are needlessly fearful, a fear that is bred of their own failings, because there really is no enemy, no "other" of which to be fearful.
It bears repeating: Pope Francis is a very nice guy. But he's also a sentimentalist, appallingly soft-headed. He offers comforting pieties, pie-in-the-sky hopefulness, mush, when what is needed at this time is something adamantine or, more exactly, benedictine. The imperilment of Europe -- that "so-called West" -- alas, requires more than this nice guy can possibly deliver.
Let a bunch of Syrian migrants into the Vatican to live, Francis. Let’s see how quickly they blow it up and kill you.
Is he stupid?
Or is he intentionally trying to destroy Western Civilization?
When was the last time this Pope discussed the extermination of Christians in the middle east at the hands of the Muslims?
Unfortunately Pope Francis is proving again and again that he is personally indifferent to religion and unable to identify evil.
This foolishness has given millions of dollars to Planned Parenthood in America... and given Europe to Islam.
As usual this is a complete nonstarter. The Pope is only infallible in matters of faith or morals, specifically when speaking ex-Cathedra (From the chair). Strawman argument from the non-Catholics.
Bless his heart.
Pope Francis ask Europe and United States to take care of Muslims displacing their own people. During the Holocaust Pius XII asked all Catholics institutions in occupied Europe to hide the persecuted Jews saving the lives of mover 800,000 Jews. Pius XII was risking the obliteration of the Catholic Church by the Nazis and were murdered as many Catholics as were Jews and the extermination camps.
Pope Francis must preach with the example and order all Catholics institutions around the world to take care of the Muslims “refuges” and he will see how the Catholics Church will be completely annihilated. The hen incubating snake eggs.
This to me is an extremely dangerous naive interpretation of Islam from a person I would expect to have knowledge of Islam.
If authentic Islam is practiced following the Koran and Hadiths, you follow it like Muhammed, the Wahabbis, and presently ISIS.
Nothing peaceful for us Kafirs in that interpretation of Islam. (As we are finding out now, first hand) - Tom
So was his selection as pope by the magisterium not infallible? If it was not an infallible choice, what is the source of authority by which the choice was made?
I guess choice for who holds the seat of Peter isn't really included in that promise to 'guide you into all truth' is it?
Good point.
The Church is not infallible and makes plenty of mistakes from time to time. Look at the current Pope for proof of that.
Strawmwan argument. But thanks for playing, see the hostess on the way out for some ;lovely paring gifts.
Pope Francis is sadly a simple-minded leftist first and a Catholic second.
Of this much, I am sure
Pope Francis is sadly a simple-minded leftist first and a Catholic second.
Of this much, I am sure
The "guide us into all truth thing" was a promise made by Jesus Christ to His church with reference to the Holy Spirit, and this promise will not fail. However, the main application is a negative one: that the errors of popes will not be made into doctrines binding of the Church.
So far, none of them have been.
But how does the Holy Spirit prevent a stupid pope, or a bad pope, from making his erroneous opinions into binding doctrines? Well, the Spirit's ways are mysterious, but sometimes, it may be by a well-timed myocardial infarction.
This two minute cartoon video about infallibility should make this sufficiently clear.
Go head and click. It's actually pretty funny, but it's true.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.