Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MarvinStinson

Here is how this is different:

Whether you disagree with it or not (and let me make it clear that I DO disagree so please don’t reply that I think Lerner is innocent), the FBI did not find any evidence of criminal behavior on the part of Lois Lerner.

The case with Hillary Clinton is significantly different in that the FBI (allegedly) HAS found criminal behavior.

Clinton has so brazenly broken the law that the FBI must insist on prosecution or lose all credibility.


96 posted on 01/11/2016 7:32:30 AM PST by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: kidd
Lois Lerner had so brazenly broken the law that the FBI should have insisted on prosecution or lose all credibility.

The FBI did not find any evidence of criminal behavior on the part of Lois Lerner.

The case with Hillary Clinton is no different in that the FBI (allegedly) HAS found criminal behavior.

Clinton has so brazenly broken the law that the FBI must insist on prosecution or lose all credibility.

But Loretta Lynch was put in place to be a continuation of Eric MY PEOPLE Holder, which she is and will be.`

150 posted on 01/11/2016 9:02:19 AM PST by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson