The FBI is going to revolt if the Justice Department refuses to bring charges against either Hillary Clinton or her former State Department staffers.
The FBI is going to revolt if the Justice Department refuses to bring charges against either Hillary Clinton or her former State Department staffers.
She is not alone in this, obuma, ValJar, Lynch, Holder and many others are at the top of this, and I'm not by any means sticking up for Hillary or Bill, but they all go down, or we as a Country need to fold...
It's D Day time folks, either we are or we are not....
Public servants SHOULD NOT be above the law. I don’t care if they are old hippies trying to become “da first female president.” If We the People have to live by the laws these morons create, the moronic politicians should also have to live by those same laws.
We are not amused!
Follow the money.
Hillary may lose the election, but I think she’s too much of a narcissist to withdraw voluntarily.
Every one of these stories came from Joe D’s comments on the Laura show. Is he still in the know?
Exhibit A: Lois Lerner
If the IRS can target conservatives with impunity, Hillary can do whatever the hell she wants. America has become a banana republic.
I disagree with the premise that people won’t understand this issue. People are not stupid. Most people have email in the work place where there are rules about what you can do. If you do not follow these rules, you could be subject to disciplinary action or be fired.
Oh goodie, now the Dems can go all in for Bernie. The only bad thing about all this is that it may be happening too soon. A few months before the election might have been better ;- )
“Other Democrats, including Joe Biden and Elizabeth Warren, would be remiss if they weren’t preparing a Plan B in case this number dips even lower, making her a more vulnerable general-election candidate.”
Haven’t we already heard Biden rumbling about how he regrets not running? Hmmmm
Ah, yes, the revolt escape hatch. Clinton can walk as long as they hang a few low-level staffers or a code monkey.
Really? These 23% are like the 5th dentist that doesn't recommend Trident gum.
How about another meme for Obama saying “If Barack Obama was a Republican, the only question left to answer about his IRS scandal would be how many decades is he going to spend in prison.”
They’d rather take her down in time to get Bernie or Biden in the race than wait til Trump takes her down.
Horse puckey - it's only difficult, because the "journalists" can't get their tongue out of her rear end long enough to write a decent story...
-PJ
Nixon was not putting the nation at risk.
The dumpy bitch would sell out to any one at any time for enough money.
Woodward just has to talk about the good old days, his 15 minutes of fame are over.
Bull shit Bob! This makes Watergate look like a Sunday school picnic by comparison!
The Clinton Foundation is “organized crime” at it’s finest, and we are financing it. Here is a good, concise summary of how the Clinton Foundation works as a tax free international money laundering scheme. It may eventually prove to be the largest political criminal enterprise in U.S. history.
This is a textbook case on how you hide foreign money sent to you and repackage it to be used for your own purposes. All tax free. Here’s how it works:
1. You create a separate foreign “charity.” In this case one in Canada.
2. Foreign oligarchs and governments, then donate to this Canadian charity. In this case, over 1,000 did - contributing mega millions. I’m sure they did this out of the goodness of their hearts, and expected nothing in return. (Imagine Putin’s buddies waking up one morning and just deciding to send untold millions to a Canadian charity).
3. The Canadian charity then bundles these separate donations and makes a massive donation to the Clinton Foundation.
4. The Clinton Foundation and the cooperating Canadian charity claim Canadian law prohibits the identification of individual donors.
5. The Clinton Foundation then “spends” some of this money for legitimate good works programs. Unfortunately, experts believe this is on the order of 10%. Much of the balance goes to enrich the Clinton’s, pay salaries to untold numbers of hangers on, and fund lavish travel, etc. Again, virtually all tax free, which means you and I are subsidizing it.
6. The Clinton Foundation, with access to the world’s best accountants, somehow fails to report much of this on their tax filings. They discover these “clerical errors” and begin the process of re-filing 5 years of tax returns.
7. Net result — foreign money, much of it from other countries, goes into the Clinton’s pockets tax free and untraceable back to the original donor. This is the textbook definition of money laundering.
Oh, by the way, the Canadian “charity” includes as a principal one Frank Giustra. Google him. He is the guy who was central to the formation of Uranium One, the Canadian company that somehow acquired massive U.S. uranium interests and then sold them to an organization controlled by Russia. This transaction required U.S. State Department approval, and guess who was Secretary of State when the approval was granted. As an aside, imagine how former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell feels. That poor schlep is in jail because he and his wife took $165,000 in gifts and loans for doing minor favors for a guy promoting a vitamin company. Not legal but not exactly putting U.S. security risk. Sarcasm aside, if you’re still not persuaded this was a cleverly structured way to get unidentified foreign money to the Clinton’s, ask
yourself this:
Why did these foreign interests funnel money through a Canadian charity? Why not donate directly to the Clinton Foundation? Better yet, why not donate money directly to the people, organizations and countries in need?
This is the essence of money laundering and influence peddling. Now you know why Hillary’s destruction of 30,000 e-mails was a risk she was willing to take.
Emphasis on “or her...staffers.”
They’ll throw a few staffers under the bus to placate the FBI and the Hildebeast will walk.
Guarantee it.