Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TBBT

I don’t think this is a smear. This is a serious constitutional question, and now is the time to bring it up. A smear, on the other hand, is a personal attack, particularly something untrue, suggesting that the candidate is a person of low character. Trump is not questioning Cruz’ citizenship — or his character — what Trump is questioning is Cruz’ eligibility for the presidency. If we are to take the constitution at face value, indeed Cruz is not eligible to run for president; he has only one citizen parent and he was born in another country. And you can be sure the democrats are going to make hay with this! And they won’t mind throwing Obama under the bus if need be as Obama is no longer an asset for the democrats.


31 posted on 01/10/2016 6:17:36 PM PST by erkelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: erkelly
This is a serious constitutional question, and now is the time to bring it up.

It's nonsense, and became moot with Obama anyway.

50 posted on 01/10/2016 6:26:07 PM PST by Timber Rattler ("To hold a pen is to be at war." --Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: erkelly
I don’t think this is a smear. This is a serious constitutional question, and now is the time to bring it up. A smear, on the other hand, is a personal attack, particularly something untrue, suggesting that the candidate is a person of low character. Trump is not questioning Cruz’ citizenship — or his character — what Trump is questioning is Cruz’ eligibility for the presidency. If we are to take the constitution at face value, indeed Cruz is not eligible to run for president; he has only one citizen parent and he was born in another country. And you can be sure the democrats are going to make hay with this! And they won’t mind throwing Obama under the bus if need be as Obama is no longer an asset for the democrats.
No. I don't agree that this is a serious constitutional question. This is Birtherism II. Just about every legal expert and liberal/conservative rag out there has said the same. If that's not good enough for you, try reading the Naturalization Act of 1790 and 1795, drafted by those wise old guys called the founders (and who would know original intent because it was they who originated it).

Naturalization Act of 1790:

And the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens: Provided, that the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States: Provided also, that no person heretofore proscribed by any States, shall be admitted a citizen as aforesaid, except by an Act of the Legislature of the State in which such person was proscribed.
Naturalization act of 1795:

and the children of citizens of the United States, born out of the limits and jurisdiction of the United States, shall be considered as citizens of the United States: Provided, That the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons, whose fathers have never been resident of the United States: Provided also, That no person heretofore proscribed by any state, or who has been legally convicted of having joined the army of Great Britain during the late war, shall be admitted a citizen as foresaid, without the consent of the legislature of the state, in which such person was proscribed.

Now I'm no lawyer, but the plain English of the Act's seem cut and dry.

What I can say - with absolute certainty - is that this issue is going nowhere. If I had a winning Powerball ticket, I would gladly bet it. This is nothing more than sleazy tactic - generally employed by leftist and generally decried by the right - to muck up the works.

99 posted on 01/10/2016 6:56:52 PM PST by TBBT (uot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: erkelly

Trump VOTED for OBama... and he wants to attack CRUZ about HIS birth certificate?
Go HOME TRUMP....


150 posted on 01/10/2016 8:15:26 PM PST by pollywog ( " O thou who changest not....ABIDE with me")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: erkelly

Finally, a word of sanity in the madly sick crowd. I agree, Cruz is not eligible and anyone who continues snarking insults has obviously never read the Constitution. They are exhibiting exactly the reason this country is in such dire straits.


162 posted on 01/10/2016 8:26:35 PM PST by Mollypitcher1 (I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson