[loveliberty2]

This statement is, perhaps, the most important declaration any candidate can make. One more President who, for whatever reason, believes he can, or must, enact laws, in violation of the Constitution's structuring of the government, will likely destroy liberty for future generations.

The Constitution was, and is, intended to be "the People's" chains for binding individuals in government and keeping "the People" free.

The founding principles of "limited government" power, strict "division and separation of powers, with checks and balances," and "fidelity to the Constitution and its limits and bounds on the exercise of power" in all circumstances--these should be the measures by which citizens should choose the next President.

Following the attempts at eroding the Constitution's limits on power by this President, Republicans should choose a candidate who will vow that he/she will not choose to attempt to enact conservative values, using the same un-Constitutional tactics as this President. The Constitution's limits must be respected, no matter how frustrating is the process.

[C210N]

Republicans should choose a candidate who will vow that he/she will not choose to attempt to enact conservative values, using the same un-Constitutional tactics as this President.

The difference between doing so, and not doing so, determines whether after 4 or 8 years, the electorate does a pendulum backlash, again, this time to another marxist POSOTUS, or instead, hopefully, a fresh electorate mindset and yearning for Constitutional government and individual freedom to another Constitutional POTUS.

[MrEdd]

Day one, all of the executive orders propping up Obamacare and giving exemptions to special interests can be repealed.

It takes a special kind of stupid not to understand either that the new president has that authority or that doing so effectively ends Obamacare.