Perhaps it is, but let us increase the stakes a little.
Let us assume a 10 year old was being raped, outright, by an FBI agent while others held the father by arm and leg, physically.
And a bystander who had guns drawn on him, photographed the assault.
I would agree that the photos are invasive, but the invasion of the rape is moreso... and evidence needs to be taken and preserved. Would you not agree?
Now we can decrease the stakes again, and come back to the particulars of this case.
The invasion of photography is still less than the invasion of the probing finger. I know you, Gwen, so I know you will see what I (and perhaps a few others, less elegantly) rightfully assert.
Laz.....Thank-you!!!!!!
I was ONLY responding to the PICTURES .....
I have as much contempt for free gropers as anyone....
If I had been standing there with my 11 yr old I would be livid!!!!!!
But then I would try to smooth it over with her.....NOT take pictures.
Maybe Homer is having a bad moment or a bad day....I don’t know.
I have agreed with him in the past....
Sheeesh! I sure wasn’t expecting this.
I would like to know what he would do if that was his little girl?
Would he stop the process......decide this is not the day to fly?
Tell the TSA where to go.....or what he thinks of them, like he did me?
Just asking!
I could never go undercover and film animal abuse at factories...I would out myself in 2 minutes but people who love animals do this for the evidence and to change things for the better.