[Las Vegas Ron]

Answer my original post first, then I'll play your game:

“The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.” Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, 168.

That is a SCOTUS decision btw.....

[Toddsterpatriot]

Answer my original post first, then I'll play your game:

Which question(s) in which post?

That is a SCOTUS decision btw.....

Yes, 1874.

These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.

You don't think he's an alien or foreigner, you just said he was a citizen.

[pookie18]

So, you’re saying he’s not eligible to be president? Tell them:

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/01/the_cruz_natural_born_citizen_fake_controversy.html

https://www.conservativereview.com/commentary/2016/01/an-unnaturally-born-non-controversy

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/429356/ted-cruz-natural-born-citizen

http://battleborndesign.com/2016/01/07/cruz-vs-obama-eligible/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2016/01/07/why-ted-cruz-is-a-natural-born-citizen/

http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/yes-ted-cruz-can-be-president