Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt
Thanks.
That's WHY I was asking.

The whole point is in the "Naturalization", or the laws defining it.
What is the root word of "Naturalization" ? Not only could the Founding Father define "natural born citizen", BUT ... THE FOUNDING FATHERS DID DEFINE IT !
And you ARE refusing the definition of "natural born citizen" CLEARLY DEFINED by our FOUNDING FATHERS !

"Natural Born Citizen" was defined for the United States, BY OUR FOUNDING FATHERS !

The Naturalization Act of 1790, let's read it !

292 posted on 01/10/2016 3:54:30 AM PST by Yosemitest (It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies ]


To: Yosemitest

You can use less ink in your replies to me. You and I will never agree on this subject. I was just providing you with the information you sought, when was FS-240 first used. You haven’t used that information for anything, which makes we wonder why you were so adamant about having it, but no matter.


293 posted on 01/10/2016 4:20:16 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson