Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cruz Citizenship Kerfuffle Is a Distraction
Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | January 7, 2016 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 01/07/2016 11:20:55 AM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 next last
To: BuckeyeTexan

.
Give it up Bucky.

That is the very foundational concept of “natural born.”

Natural born means that the citizenship is a natural fact independent of place of birth.


81 posted on 01/07/2016 3:47:37 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

.
>> “I think the issue is whether or not (both of) Ted’s parents were US Citizens at the time of his birth.” <<

.
That wasn’t even the issue for Obama.

You’re making stuff up.
.


82 posted on 01/07/2016 3:49:53 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan; conservativejoy

.
No premise in law is left in question for SCOTUS to rule.

That would be legislation by the bench.

The court is not required to weigh in on anything, and congress has the power to limit court jurisdiction.


83 posted on 01/07/2016 3:54:34 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

.
You’re just brimming full of manure today, aren’t you!


84 posted on 01/07/2016 3:56:42 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2; Calpublican

.

How can you keep making up false facts?

You’d make a great gopher for Pelousey.


85 posted on 01/07/2016 4:00:33 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
There is no statutory element to Cruz’ citizenship.

Horsesh*t. Cruz's citizenship is granted by Congress under 8 U.S. Code § 1401. It is not granted by the Constitution.

86 posted on 01/07/2016 4:19:03 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

Yes. She would be a U.S. citizen unless she formally renounced her citizenship. She didn’t as I understand it.


87 posted on 01/07/2016 4:27:18 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

Where did he say that?
Ted’s mother was born an American an citizen, has remained an American citizen all her life, was an America citizen when Ted Cruz was born. That’s all that matters.


88 posted on 01/07/2016 4:29:50 PM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Calpublican

Oh for pity’s sake. Trump simply answers a reporter’s question—and for that matter, in a manner that is almost sleepwalking compared to Trump’s usual intensity—and suddenly you’re turning this into a premeditated attack on St. Cruz?

It’s one thing if you don’t like what Trump said. It’s another thing if you don’t like Trump either. But it’s far removed from either of those if you start seeing conspiracies under every bush against your candidate.


89 posted on 01/07/2016 4:46:55 PM PST by Luircin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

“Minors do not automatically confer citizenship on their children.”

Where do the statutes state a minimum age for a mother that is relevant to her child’s citizenship?


90 posted on 01/07/2016 4:59:39 PM PST by cymbeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: cymbeline

.
In all things legal, minors can do nothing.

That is the meaning of minor.


91 posted on 01/07/2016 5:24:24 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Catsrus

.
Nice try at trolling again, but Cruz has no sealed records.

And wipe that goo off your chin.


92 posted on 01/07/2016 5:27:40 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: conservativejoy
Since the Constitution gave Congress the authority to make that ruling, where is the issue?

If we lived in a sane world, there would be no issue.

But because the media is desperate to try to drive a wedge between Cruz's supporters and Trump's supporters, AND to ruin Cruz's political career, it is suddenly The Most Important Issue In The World.

93 posted on 01/07/2016 6:03:47 PM PST by Luircin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

“In all things legal, minors can do nothing.”

Where do the statutes relevant to Cruz’s situation say “minor”?


94 posted on 01/08/2016 4:48:28 AM PST by cymbeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

I assure you that dual citizenship between Canada and USA is real. My mother and father were posted to Washington during WW2. My sister was born in Bethesda. She had dual citizenship until she voted in Canada when she turned 21. That CANCELLED the US citizenship.
She had legal advice on this choice.


95 posted on 01/08/2016 5:16:02 AM PST by BillM (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Cruz Citizenship Kerfuffle Is a Distraction

Of course it is. Why do you think Trump raised it to begin with?

96 posted on 01/08/2016 5:20:39 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

He did not, it was the Washington Compost who did.


97 posted on 01/08/2016 5:25:42 AM PST by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
He did not, it was the Washington Compost who did.

And Trump ran with it. He's done it in the past and he'll keep on doing it so long as he thinks he can get political advantage out of it over his closest rival. Why else would he do it?

98 posted on 01/08/2016 5:28:20 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
No premise in law is left in question for SCOTUS to rule.

Now, I know, that you know better than that. I know that you've done the research and read the SCOTUS decisions just as I have. You know very well that we don't have a ruling on citizens at birth being the equivalent of an NBC. We have conjecture and speculation. Both sides of the NBC debate readily admit that.

99 posted on 01/08/2016 10:03:58 AM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

.
You’re asking for something that we do not need.

There is no question to be answered.

Congress provided as authorized in the constitution.

Congress has the power to limit SCOTUS’ ability to hear such cases.

You are attempting to insert the court where it does not belong. (as in its recent folly on queer marriage)


100 posted on 01/08/2016 11:03:09 AM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson